Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities

Abstract

The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is routinely used as a summary measure of health outcome for economic evaluation, which incorporates the impact on both the quantity and quality of life. Key studies relating to the QALY and utility measurement are the sources of data. Areas of agreement include the need for a standard measure of health outcome to enable comparisons across different disease areas and populations, and the methods used for valuing health states in utility measurement. Areas of controversy include the limitation of the QALY approach in terms of the health benefits it can capture, its blindness towards equity concerns, the underlying theoretical assumptions and the most appropriate generic preference-based measure of utility. There is growing debate relating to whether a QALY is the same regardless of who accrues it, and also the issue as to who should value health states. Research is required to further enhance the QALY approach to deal with challenges relating to equity-weighted utility maximization and testing the validity of underlying assumptions. Issues around choosing between condition-specific measures and generic instruments also merit further investigation.

A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy

“…Patient satisfaction was assessed using Odom criteria [17]. SF-36 scores were converted into SF-6D scores [18] (a validated measure of health-related quality of life that can be used as an alternative to the EQ-5D) to calculate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) [19]. A change from baseline approach was implemented using preoperative and 2 year SF-6D scores.…”

Real-World, Long-Term Quality of Life Following Therapeutic OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment

“…6 A multitude of tools, commonly referred to as utilities (which can be generic or disease specific and generally cover physical, mental, and social aspects) are available for assessing QoL. [7][8][9] This concept of using utilities is now widely recognized for interpreting QoL data in the medical community by deriving a score based on results from a patient's self-reported questionnaire. Utility scores range between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating poor health and 1 indicating perfect health.…”

Health care costs matter: a review of nutrition economics – is there a role for nutritional support to reduce the cost of medical health care?

“…One QALY equates to 1 year in perfect health 24 ), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (it is a statistic used in cost-effectiveness analysis to summarize the cost-effectiveness of a health care intervention. It is defined as the difference in cost between two possible interventions, divided by the difference in their effect 25 ). As noted in Figure 1, the reviewed studies use a wide range of economic analyses and tools.…”