Health promotion theories and models

McKinnon, Merryn; Chakrapani, Venkatesan; Kaur, Jasvir; Kaur, Manmeet; Kumar, Rajesh; Reweti, Angelique; Severinsen, Christina

doi:10.1017/9781108895682.002

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 162 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Written consent was obtained for each participating adult (18+). For children (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), parental or guardian consent was obtained in addition to the child's assent. Verbal and written details about the study were provided to participants in iTaukei and/or English according to preference.…”

Section: Consent For Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluating the acceptability of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, with the case of a portable hygiene intervention (The Spatap) in three Fijian communities, a mixed-methods study.

Hosking,

Richardson,

Gray

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The implementation of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in low-resource communities can improve health outcomes. Acceptability evaluations can increase the uptake and sustainability of WASH interventions, but there is limited literature on how to conduct them. We developed a theory-based acceptability evaluation using mixed-methods and applied it to conduct the first acceptability evaluation the Spatap, a portable, water-saving hygiene intervention, in three Fijian communities. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study in three Fijian communities aiming to evaluate the acceptability of the Spatap. We conducted a baseline household survey (n = 207) on WASH access, environmental conditions, and acceptability. We asked seven questions on acceptability aligned with Sekhon et al. (2017)’s Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) for healthcare interventions component constructs. We calculated a total acceptability score and modelled it against sociodemographic predictors using multiple linear modelling in R. In December 2022, we conducted three focus group discussions (FGD) with community members (n = 22) on experienced acceptability. We inductively and deductively coded transcripts using NVIVO (ver 12) and analysed the data using thematic analysis. Results Baseline acceptability scores out of 35 were high (med 29, min 18, Q1: 28, Q3: 35, max 35) and few barriers were reported, indicating the Spatap was initially accepted by the communities. Burden and cost scored lower than the other component constructs. Sociodemographic factors (age, gender, education, employment) did not significantly affect acceptability scores. The Spataps were still in use and acceptable five months later. Overall, convenient location and timesaving promoted acceptance of the Spatap. In some larger households, time spent re-filling the bottle was as a burden, but the costs of larger bottles were prohibitive. Challenging environmental conditions (water insecurity and climate events) promoted acceptance of the Spatap as a water saving device, and it fit with existing adaptations to water insecurity. Conclusions The TFA was useful to frame the acceptability evaluation, but qualitative methods are more appropriate than the score-based method. For future Spatap implementations in low-resource communities, the accessibility of bottles, local-language instruction, provision of Spataps per head rather than household and water availability should be considered. Promotion of the convenient location and ease of use for children may increase initial acceptance. Further research on the acceptability of the Spatap in other contexts, and its efficacy to reduce infectious disease is required.

show abstract

Section: Consent For Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Beliefs, attitudes, perceptions, and cultural norms in uence whether people adopt interventions and use them over time, regardless of their effect on health [14][15][16]. Because of this, the 'acceptability' of an intervention to the intended users affects adoption and sustainability [17][18][19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the acceptability of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, with the case of a portable hygiene intervention (The Spatap) in three Fijian communities, a mixed-methods study.

Hosking,

Richardson,

Gray

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the context of this study, this model elucidates the potential correlation of lifestyle factors, such as diet and exercise, with mental health and well-being. The health promotion model accentuates the elements that facilitate and maintain healthy behaviors, highlighting the importance of individual perceptions, motivations, and behaviors in shaping health outcomes (22). This model offers insights into the psychological and behavioral mechanisms underlying the associations between lifestyle factors and mental health and well-being.…”

Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Associations of lifestyle with mental health and well-being in Chinese adults: a nationwide study

Wang

Shi

et al. 2023

Front. Nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundA healthy lifestyle is beneficial to individuals’ health. However, little is known about the associations of lifestyle factors with mental health and well-being. This study examined the associations of lifestyle factors with mental health (i.e., depression, anxiety, loneliness, perceived pressure, and self-rated health status) and well-being in Chinese adults.MethodsA nationally representative survey was conducted in China from 20 June 2022 to 31 August 2022. Data from the survey were analyzed using multiple linear regression to determine the associations of lifestyle with mental health and well-being in Chinese adults. Standardized regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multiple linear regression.ResultsThe survey included 28,138 Chinese adults. Multiple linear regression results showed that there were significant negative associations of lifestyle scores with scores of depression (β = −0.93, 95% CI: −0.98, −0.88), anxiety (β = −0.71, 95% CI: −0.76, −0.67), loneliness (β = −0.23, 95% CI: −0.24, −0.21), and perceived pressure (β = −0.19, 95% CI: −0.22, −0.16). Moreover, there were significant positive associations of lifestyle with self-rated health status (β = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.79, 2.20) and well-being (β = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.02).ConclusionThis study provides insight into the associations of lifestyle factors with mental health and well-being and highlights the importance of improving and maintaining healthy lifestyle behaviors for favorable mental health and well-being.

show abstract

Health promotion theories and models

Cited by 2 publications

References 162 publications

Evaluating the acceptability of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, with the case of a portable hygiene intervention (The Spatap) in three Fijian communities, a mixed-methods study.

Evaluating the acceptability of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, with the case of a portable hygiene intervention (The Spatap) in three Fijian communities, a mixed-methods study.

Associations of lifestyle with mental health and well-being in Chinese adults: a nationwide study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About