Available online xxxIntroduction: Palliative chemotherapy is the principal treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS); however prognosis is limited (median overall survival 12-19 months). In this setting, patient values and priorities are central to personalised treatment decisions. Patients and methods: The prospective HOLISTIC study was conducted in the UK and the Netherlands assessing healthrelated quality of life in STS patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. Participants completed a questionnaire before starting chemotherapy, including attitudes towards quality of life (QoL) versus length of life (LoL), decisional control preferences, and decisional conflict. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and preferences. Results: One hundred and thirty-seven patients with advanced STS participated (UK: n ¼ 72, the Netherlands: n ¼ 65). Median age was 62 (27-79) years. Preference for extended LoL (n ¼ 66, 48%) was slightly more common than preference for QoL (n ¼ 56, 41%); 12 patients (9%) valued LoL and QoL equally (missing: n ¼ 3). Younger patients (age <40 years) prioritised LoL, whereas two-thirds of older patients (aged !65 years) felt that QoL was equally or more important than LoL (P ¼ 0.020). Decisional conflict was most common in patients who prioritised QoL (P ¼ 0.024). Most patients preferred an active (n ¼ 45, 33%) or collaborative (n ¼ 59, 44%) role in treatment decisions. Gender, performance status, and country were significantly associated with preferred role. Concordance between preferred and actual role in chemotherapy decision was high (n ¼ 104, 76%). Conclusions: Heterogeneous priorities and preferences among advanced STS patients support personalised decisions about palliative treatment. Considering individual differences during treatment discussions may enhance communication and optimise patient-centred care.