Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D–5L: South Australian population norms

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough a five level version of the widely-used EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) instrument has been developed, population norms are not yet available for Australia to inform the future valuation of health in economic evaluations. The aim of this study was to estimate HrQOL normative values for the EQ-5D-5L preference-based measure in a large, randomly selected, community sample in South Australia.MethodsThe EQ-5D-5L instrument was included in the 2013 South Australian Health Omnibus Survey, an interviewer-administered, face-to-face, cross-sectional survey. Respondents rated their level of impairment across dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and global health rating on a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). Utility scores were derived using the newly-developed UK general population-based algorithm and relationships between utility and EQ-VAS scores and socio-demographic factors were also explored using multivariate regression analyses.ResultsUltimately, 2,908 adults participated in the survey (63.4 % participation rate). The mean utility and EQ-VAS scores were 0.91 (95 CI 0.90, 0.91) and 78.55 (95 % CI 77.95, 79.15), respectively. Almost half of respondents reported no problems across all dimensions (42.8 %), whereas only 7.2 % rated their health >90 on the EQ-VAS (100 = the best health you can imagine). Younger age, male gender, longer duration of education, higher annual household income, employment and marriage/de facto relationships were all independent, statistically significant predictors of better health status (p < 0.01) measured with the EQ-VAS. Only age and employment status were associated with higher utility scores, indicating fundamental differences between these measures of health status.ConclusionsThis is the first Australian study to apply the EQ-5D-5L in a large, community sample. Overall, findings are consistent with EQ-5D-5L utility and VAS scores reported for other countries and indicate that the majority of South Australian adults report themselves in full health. When valuing health in Australian economic evaluations, the utility population norms can be used to estimate HrQOL. More generally, the EQ-VAS score may be a better measure of population health given the smaller ceiling effect and broader coverage of HrQOL dimensions. Further research is recommended to update EQ-5D-5L population norms using the Australian general population specific scoring algorithm once this becomes publically available.

Fall prevention in primary care using chronic disease management plans: A process evaluation of provider and consumer perspectives

“…The participants did not present with serious limitations in their mobility, self-care, pain and anxiety as measured by the EQ 5D5L Health status utility tool, and ratings on the EQ VAS quality of life tool were high. These were both consistent with Australian community norms (McCaffrey, Kaambwa, Currow, & Ratcliffe, 2016).…”

“…These were both consistent with Australian community norms (McCaffrey, Kaambwa, Currow, & Ratcliffe, 2016). All the AHPs were private practitioners.…”

Challenges of Ageing in Portugal: Data from the EpiDoC Cohort

“…37 These trends were also observed for older Australians: the mean EQ-5D-3L score was 0.87 between 65 and 74 years of age and 0.83 at age 75 years or older). 38 In our Portuguese older adults, quality of life remained stable across age strata.…”

Patient‐reported health outcomes in patients with non‐melanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis: results from a large‐scale observational study analysing effects of diagnoses and disease progression

“…To examine whether a proposed disease continuum is also accompanied by impairment in QL (EQ Index and EQ VAS), two‐way ANCOVAs (analyses of covariance) were conducted. Age and sex were included in the model as both factors were consistently found to be related with QL (e.g …”

“…Age and sex were included in the model as both factors were consistently found to be related with QL (e.g. 35 ). Two different ANCOVA models were used to examine QL in patients with different diagnosis.…”