2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00525.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health risk appraisal for older people in general practice using an expert system: a pilot study

Abstract: The prevention of disability in later life is a major challenge facing industrialised societies. Primary care practitioners are well positioned to maintain and promote health in older people, but the British experience of population-wide preventive interventions has been disappointing. Health risk appraisal (HRA), an emergent information-technology-based approach from the USA, has the potential for fulfilling some of the objectives of the National Service Framework for Older People. Information technology and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of people judged the questionnaire as easy to comprehend (U.K., 81.4%; Germany, 93.1%; Switzerland, 97.2%) and to complete (83.2%, 91.4%, and 95.8%, respectively). Feed-back from older persons to the participant reports was systematically evaluated [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of people judged the questionnaire as easy to comprehend (U.K., 81.4%; Germany, 93.1%; Switzerland, 97.2%) and to complete (83.2%, 91.4%, and 95.8%, respectively). Feed-back from older persons to the participant reports was systematically evaluated [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We invited a random sample of 1 in 3 community-dwelling older people (≥65 years old) from five general practices in London and Hertfordshire to participate in the MRAO [12, 13] which was contextualised to each locality in 2012. The sampling strategy was based on a recruitment target of 150–200 per practice, equivalent to a 40% response rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Man muss hier aber mit dem Nachteil unsystematischen Vorgehens, nämlich mit versäumter Einflussnahme, rechnen (denn nicht alle werden angesprochen) [23,28,29,32,37].…”
Section: Nutzen Hausärztlicher Präventionunclassified