2022
DOI: 10.29333/ejgm/12466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health science students’ perceptions about Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) as a method of clinical evaluation

Abstract: Background: For decades, practical clinical examinations have been valid and reliable methods to evaluate health sciences undergraduate students' clinical performance and competencies for a wide range of skills. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a widely used practical clinical examination. This study aims to assess health sciences students' perceptions about OSCE as an evaluation method of clinical skills acquisition. Methods:A descriptive cross-sectional design was used, and 157 students of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study , the students' assessment of their pre-OSCE exam preparation, was greater with a mean score (M = 15.4, SD 4.81). These results are consistent with those of earlier research, which demonstrated that the majority of the students had a pre-OSCE preparation through revision [14]. Furthermore, another study by Edward, M. I. et.al [13] revealed that the respondents perceived OSCE as demanding less preparation than traditional practical exams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our study , the students' assessment of their pre-OSCE exam preparation, was greater with a mean score (M = 15.4, SD 4.81). These results are consistent with those of earlier research, which demonstrated that the majority of the students had a pre-OSCE preparation through revision [14]. Furthermore, another study by Edward, M. I. et.al [13] revealed that the respondents perceived OSCE as demanding less preparation than traditional practical exams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%