2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2013.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health worker exposure risk during inhalation sedation with sevoflurane using the (AnaConDa®) anaesthetic conserving device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another potential risk factor is the use of inhalational sedation devices postoperatively in the intensive care unit (ICU) for a range of different conditions [ 25 28 ]. Patients susceptible to MH also resident in the ICU may be at risk from such exposure, although administration of sevoflurane via the AnaConDa® device was found to be safe for healthcare workers with the caveat that a gas extraction system should be used in conjunction with such devices to reduce occupational exposure [ 29 ]. A case of MH triggered by sevoflurane administration via an AnaConDa® was reported in a patient admitted to ICU for lumbalgia.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential risk factor is the use of inhalational sedation devices postoperatively in the intensive care unit (ICU) for a range of different conditions [ 25 28 ]. Patients susceptible to MH also resident in the ICU may be at risk from such exposure, although administration of sevoflurane via the AnaConDa® device was found to be safe for healthcare workers with the caveat that a gas extraction system should be used in conjunction with such devices to reduce occupational exposure [ 29 ]. A case of MH triggered by sevoflurane administration via an AnaConDa® was reported in a patient admitted to ICU for lumbalgia.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air pollution was first described by Sackey and colleagues in 2004, who reported mean ISO concentrations of approximately 0.1 ppm in patient rooms and peaks of up to 11 ppm during replacement of the AnaConDa™ filter . Subsequent studies found that waste VA concentrations were slightly higher (0.3‐2.0 ppm) in patient rooms and personnel's breathing zones, whereas the highest peaks (20‐50 ppm) were detected close to the expiratory port of the ventilator …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Technologies are currently being developed and refined to capture and destroy scavenged agents, thereby further reducing their atmospheric release [36]. The possibility of rescuing them again is also actually being considered, extracting them from these carbon filters where they remain trapped, in order to be reused, achieving recycling in the form of a circular economy (CONTRAfluran TM ) [37]. Furthermore, we should always consider to use low oxygen/air flows, appropriate for the delivery system used [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%