Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundNational levels of personal health-care access and quality can be approximated by measuring mortality rates from causes that should not be fatal in the presence of effective medical care (ie, amenable mortality). Previous analyses of mortality amenable to health care only focused on high-income countries and faced several methodological challenges. In the present analysis, we use the highly standardised cause of death and risk factor estimates generated through the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) to improve and expand the quantification of personal health-care access and quality for 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2015.MethodsWe mapped the most widely used list of causes amenable to personal health care developed by Nolte and McKee to 32 GBD causes. We accounted for variations in cause of death certification and misclassifications through the extensive data standardisation processes and redistribution algorithms developed for GBD. To isolate the effects of personal health-care access and quality, we risk-standardised cause-specific mortality rates for each geography-year by removing the joint effects of local environmental and behavioural risks, and adding back the global levels of risk exposure as estimated for GBD 2015. We employed principal component analysis to create a single, interpretable summary measure–the Healthcare Quality and Access (HAQ) Index–on a scale of 0 to 100. The HAQ Index showed strong convergence validity as compared with other health-system indicators, including health expenditure per capita (r=0·88), an index of 11 universal health coverage interventions (r=0·83), and human resources for health per 1000 (r=0·77). We used free disposal hull analysis with bootstrapping to produce a frontier based on the relationship between the HAQ Index and the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a measure of overall development consisting of income per capita, average years of education, and total fertility rates. This frontier allowed us to better quantify the maximum levels of personal health-care access and quality achieved across the development spectrum, and pinpoint geographies where gaps between observed and potential levels have narrowed or widened over time.FindingsBetween 1990 and 2015, nearly all countries and territories saw their HAQ Index values improve; nonetheless, the difference between the highest and lowest observed HAQ Index was larger in 2015 than in 1990, ranging from 28·6 to 94·6. Of 195 geographies, 167 had statistically significant increases in HAQ Index levels since 1990, with South Korea, Turkey, Peru, China, and the Maldives recording among the largest gains by 2015. Performance on the HAQ Index and individual causes showed distinct patterns by region and level of development, yet substantial heterogeneities emerged for several causes, including cancers in highest-SDI countries; chronic kidney disease, diabetes, diarrhoeal diseases, and lower respiratory infections among middle-SDI countries; and measles and tetanus among...

Improving access to medicines via the Health Impact Fund in India: a stakeholder analysis

“…However, it is of great interest that members of all stakeholder groups, including the pharmaceutical sector, feel strongly that the status quo is problematic. In the Global Burden of Disease Study, India ranked 154th among 195 countries for healthcare access and quality [43]; therefore, the problem is wider than access to medicines. Moreover, there is wide regional variation across India in disease burden and disease outcomes [44].…”

Rethinking community based strategies to tackle health inequities in South Asia

“…Important health system factors responsible for these inequities relate to lack of trained human resources12 and quality of care in health facilities in rural populations 13. Community based strategies have emerged against this background to overcome health worker shortage in rural areas, especially those of doctors and nurses, and improve access to health services 67…”

California Universal Health Care Bill: an economic stimulus and life-saving proposal

“…7 Specifically, 34 countries score higher than the US on the Health Access & Quality Index (HAQ), a metric based on amenable mortality, or death that could be averted with medical care. 8 All of these countries provide a form of universal healthcare (Fig 1). 9,10 …”

“…Better outcomes are achieved with lower costs in many countries with universal healthcare. For example, the US ranks 59th for amenable mortality from heart disease, 44th for amenable mortality from cancer, 8 and 41st for infant mortality, 10 despite the highest per-capita healthcare expenditures in the world. 19 Over the past 15 years, healthcare premiums have soared by more than 150% and healthcare expenditures by 130%, compared to only a 35% rise in median household income.…”