Healthcare access for asylum seekers and refugees in England: a mixed methods study exploring service users’ and health care professionals’ awareness

Abstract

Background With the aim of decreasing immigration, the British government extended charging for healthcare in England for certain migrants in 2017. There is concern these policies amplify the barriers to healthcare already faced by asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs). Awareness has been shown to be fundamental to access. This article jointly explores (i) health care professionals’ (HCPs) awareness of migrants’ eligibility for healthcare, and (ii) ASRs’ awareness of health services. Methods Mixed methods were used. Quantitative survey data explored HCPs’ awareness of migrants’ eligibility to healthcare after the extension of charging regulations. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with ASRs were analyzed thematically using Saurman’s domains of awareness as a framework. Results In total 514 HCPs responded to the survey. Significant gaps in HCPs’ awareness of definitions, entitlements and charging regulations were identified. 80% of HCP respondents were not confident defining the immigration categories upon which eligibility for care rests. Only a small minority (6%) reported both awareness and understanding of the charging regulations. In parallel, the 18 ASRs interviewed had poor awareness of their eligibility for free National Health Service care and suitability for particular services. This was compounded by language difficulties, social isolation, frequent asylum dispersal accommodation moves, and poverty. Conclusion This study identifies significant confusion amongst both HCP and ASR concerning eligibility and healthcare access. The consequent negative impact on health is concerning given the contemporary political climate, where eligibility for healthcare depends on immigration status.

Antimicrobial Resistance & Migrants in Sweden: Poor Living Conditions Enforced by Migration Control Policies as a Risk Factor for Optimal Public Health Management

“…Without reliable baseline data on AMR amongst different populations, it is not possible to directly measure the role migration control policies have on AMR, but there is however substantial data linking those policies to worsening life conditions which are understood as risk factors in AMR (11,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). For example, migration control policies in the UK that require healthcare professionals to assess an individual's migration status prior to receiving treatment, as well as the introduction of fees for some, has created significant uncertainty amongst both those professionals and refugees and asylum seekers such that many have either been refused or not sought healthcare despite their need and entitlement (31). Whilst refugees and asylum seekers formally have access, there is significant confusion amongst both health professionals and those requiring healthcare that undermine the legal entitlement.…”

Consternation and complexity: learning from people who seek asylum

“…Added to that, the intergenerational effects of forced migration impact their children [16]. Navigation of unfamiliar health systems and language barriers impede access to care, augmented by a stark lack of awareness by health professionals of their context and entitlements [17].…”

Clinician-led evidence-based activism: a critical analysis

“…Tomkow led on the publication of Medact's research (Tomkow et al, 2019), as well as her own (Kang et al, 2019). Tomkow was aware of how knowledge can be transformed by the framing of its communication when deciding what to do with the survey and interview results.…”