Evidence-based practice (EBP), like information literacy, is concerned with an individual's knowledge, skills, and attitudes relating to using information. EBP is now a professional competency in fields as diverse as social work, nursing and allied health fields, and public policy. A comparison of the Association of College and Research Libraries' Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education with the commonly accepted EBP model shows congruence, but the two models diverge in their use of authority of the producer as a marker of information quality and in their relative emphasis on formulation of the research question and application of information.ollowing its birth in the field of medicine, many other professions have adopted the evidence-based paradigm for decision making and have incorporated skills and knowledge in evidence-based practice (EBP) as part of the educational standards for professional preparation. A cursory search of bibliographic databases will reveal publications on evidencebased practice in fields such as software engineering, librarianship, education, social work, human resources management, criminal justice, nursing, and allied health, to name a few.1 Academic librarians should become familiar with the concept of evidence-based practice because it builds on a foundation of information literacy (IL) and therefore offers an argument for increased integration of IL skills instruction into the preparatory curriculum in many disciplines. This paper examines the parallels between the frameworks of EBP and IL by comparing two of the foundational texts for each framework: