2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthcare practitioner experiences and willingness to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis in the US

Abstract: Background and objectives Less than 10 percent of the more than one million people vulnerable to HIV are using preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Practitioners are critical to ensuring the delivery of PrEP across care settings. In this study, we target a group of prescribers focused on providing HIV care and seeking up-to-date information about HIV. We assessed their experiences prescribing PrEP, whether these experiences differed by clinical specialty, and examined associations between willingness to prescribe P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Family physicians in our study differed, however, in their views on FPs' engagement in starting clients on PrEP and in providing follow-up care. Where previous quantitative studies mainly explored whether FPs would be willing to prescribe PrEP, our study thus provides a deeper understanding of their preferred degree of involvement in PrEP care ( 16 , 31 , 32 ). One central aspect that may influence such preferences, is preserving an acceptable cost-benefit balance in the FP practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family physicians in our study differed, however, in their views on FPs' engagement in starting clients on PrEP and in providing follow-up care. Where previous quantitative studies mainly explored whether FPs would be willing to prescribe PrEP, our study thus provides a deeper understanding of their preferred degree of involvement in PrEP care ( 16 , 31 , 32 ). One central aspect that may influence such preferences, is preserving an acceptable cost-benefit balance in the FP practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV specialists are often seen as the experts in PrEP, but their focus is generally on individuals already living with HIV and they are not as likely to interact with HIV-negative individuals. [12][13][14] NPs in primary care are uniquely positioned to meet the challenge of providing PrEP to individuals. Not only are there more primary care providers compared with HIV specialists, but the number of visits individuals have with their primary care providers further reinforces that primary care is the best source of PrEP for most individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only are there more primary care providers compared with HIV specialists, but the number of visits individuals have with their primary care providers further reinforces that primary care is the best source of PrEP for most individuals. 12 NPs in primary care settings are essential to increasing PrEP use among those at risk of HIV acquisition. The next two sections outline a plan to decrease barriers and provide a step-by-step approach to initiating PrEP in the primary care setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical lack of PCPs who prescribe PrEP exists (Chan et al, 2020;Leech et al, 2020). Many PCPs refer their patients to infectious disease (ID) providers or worse yet, they do not screen for HIV and PrEP need and thus, do not make referrals to ID providers (Mayer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Summary Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While PCPs lack of commitment to prescribing PrEP can be attributed to several factors, PCPs have most frequently identified a lack of knowledge about PrEP prescribing and concerns about insurance coverage for PrEP as two of the largest barriers to PrEP prescribing (Leech et al, 2020;Patel et al, 2018;Petroll et al, 2017). While research has focused on barriers and facilitators to PrEP prescribing from the patient perspective, few studies have examined this phenomenon from the perspective of PCPs, highlighting the need for such studies (Leech et al, 2020).…”
Section: Summary Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%