Healthcare Professionals’ and Policy Makers’ Views on Implementing a Clinical Practice Guideline of Hypertension Management: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

IntroductionMost studies have reported barriers to guideline usage mainly from doctors’ perspective; few have reported the perspective of other stakeholders. This study aimed to determine the views and barriers to adherence of a national clinical practice guideline (CPG) on management of hypertension from the perspectives of policymakers, doctors and allied healthcare professionals.MethodsThis study used a qualitative approach with purposive sampling. Seven in depth interviews and six focus group discussions were conducted with 35 healthcare professionals (policy makers, doctors, pharmacists and nurses) at a teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, between February and June 2013. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and checked. Thematic approach was used to analyse the data.ResultsTwo main themes and three sub-themes emerged from this study. The main themes were (1) variation in the use of CPG and (2) barriers to adherence to CPG. The three sub-themes for barriers were issues inherent to the CPG, systems and policy that is not supportive of CPG use, and attitudes and behaviour of stakeholders. The main users of the CPG were the primary care doctors. Pharmacists only partially use the guidelines, while nurses and policy makers were not using the CPG at all. Participants had suggested few strategies to improve usage and adherence to CPG. First, update the CPG regularly and keep its content simple with specific sections for allied health workers. Second, use technology to facilitate CPG accessibility and provide protected time for implementation of CPG recommendations. Third, incorporate local CPG in professional training, link CPG adherence to key performance indicators and provide incentives for its use.ConclusionsBarriers to the use of CPG hypertension management span across all stakeholders. The development and implementation of CPG focused mainly on doctors with lack of involvement of other healthcare stakeholders. Guidelines should be made simple, current, reliable, accessible, inclusive of all stakeholders and with good policy support.

Perceived Potential Barriers to Implementation of Nutritional Therapy Practice Guidelines in Critically Ill Adults in a District of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

“…Regarding these results, Patel et al (2016) state that lack of awareness of practice guidelines and lack of confidence in implementing guidelines are common among care providers, which may influence delivery of nutritional therapy. The findings of the current study seem consistent with results of a study by (Lee et al, 2015) which revealed that barriers to guideline adherence include adopter factors such as lack of awareness, non-familiarity, disagreement, lack of self-efficacy and low outcome expectancy as well as the inertia of previous practice and external barriers.…”

Can Leadership Enhance Patient Satisfaction? Assessing the Role of Administrative and Medical Quality

“…Unintentional re-admissions would be reflected in the effect of medical results not being suitable sometimes. One approach to advance medical quality is to create guidelines concentrating on medical care quality with the aim of refining the consequences of the medical processes [33].…”

Healthcare providers’ perspectives on use of the national guideline for family planning services in Amhara Region, Ethiopia: a qualitative study

“…When the guideline was available in health facilities, other issues were identified as impeding their use, including language and format of guidelines. Other studies have also identified these features of guidelines as factors that negatively impact utilisation 31–33…”