This article refers to 'Temporal trends in initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and risk of subsequent withdrawal in patients with heart failure: a nationwide study in Denmark from 2003-2017' by D. Zahir et al., published in this issue on pages 539-547.The steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure (HHF) in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their incorporation into US and European guidelines as a class I indication for HFrEF held the promise for a substantial reduction in cardiovascular mortality, HHFs, and consequentially health care costs. It is therefore discouraging to observe that despite a class I indication in guidelines, over several years their use remains suboptimal in comparison to the other major guideline-recommended therapies for HFrEF.In this issue of the Journal, Zahir et al. 1 report upon the temporal trends in initiation and subsequent withdrawal of an MRA from a nationwide study of 51 512 patients with HFrEF in Denmark from 2003 to 2017. They found that only 40% of patients initiated an MRA within 6 months of their heart failure (HF) diagnosis. Furthermore, the use of an MRA did not increase significantly over the past decade. In those in whom an MRA was initiated, 49% of patients discontinued them and only 40% of these patients restarted them. The suboptimal use of MRAs in patients with HFrEF in Denmark 1 is unfortunately not unique. The US Get With the Guidelines Heart Failure Registry (GWTG-HF) 2 also found that the use of MRAs in patients with HFrEF was suboptimal, even in patients with normal renal function in whom the risk of inducing hyperkalaemia (HK) is minimal. In view of the widespread underutilization of MRAs and their poor persistence in patients with HFrEF 1,2 despite evidence of their benefit and repeated recommendations in guidelines, it is highly unlikely that further reemphasis and dissemination of guidelines will remedy the situation. Consequently, we proposeThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Journal of Heart Failure or of the European Society of Cardiology.