2009
DOI: 10.1348/000712608x304478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthy ageing, perceived motor‐efficacy, and performance on cognitively demanding action tasks

Abstract: Current measures assessing older adults' functional ability detect existing limitations on essential tasks rather than changes in other aspects of functioning that could indicate future limitations. The perceived motor-efficacy scale was developed to measure capability beliefs of healthy older adults across a range of daily action tasks. Subscales were developed through interviews with older volunteers and academics, then administered to participants aged 60-96 (N=300). Factor analysis of subscale scores produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychosocial variables were assessed by self-report questionnaires: the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) to assess quality of life 19 , the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) to assess mood 20 , the Perceived Motor-Efficacy Scale for Older Adults (PMES-OA) to assess functional ability 21 , and the UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3) 22 as a measure of emotional and social loneliness. The psychosocial measures were collected on visit 1 (baseline), visit 4 (12 weeks) and visit 6 (24 weeks) for both groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychosocial variables were assessed by self-report questionnaires: the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) to assess quality of life 19 , the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) to assess mood 20 , the Perceived Motor-Efficacy Scale for Older Adults (PMES-OA) to assess functional ability 21 , and the UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3) 22 as a measure of emotional and social loneliness. The psychosocial measures were collected on visit 1 (baseline), visit 4 (12 weeks) and visit 6 (24 weeks) for both groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…functional capacity, well-being and social interaction). These areas were assessed using the following self-report questionnaires: the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) to assess mood [57]; the Short-Form (36) Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire which measures quality of life [58]; the Perceived Motor-Efficacy Scale for Older Adults (PMES-OA) to assess functional ability [59]; and the UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3) [60] as a measure of emotional and social loneliness. Questionnaires were completed by both groups at visits 1, 4 and 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older adults with high confidence in their cognitive abilities have been shown to produce minor errors during cognitive performance tasks, whereas those with lower confidence produce extreme errors. Beliefs about memory performance have been shown to be emotionally charged and self-consciousness regarding cognitive capacities is an indication of stress as well as a source of stress (Potter, Grealy, & O"Connor, 2009).…”
Section: Mild Cognitive Impairment (Mci)mentioning
confidence: 99%