2004
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.3.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing-in-Noise: Comparison of Listeners with Normal and (Aided) Impaired Hearing

Abstract: In this study, the performance of 48 listeners with normal hearing was compared to the performance of 46 listeners with documented hearing loss. Various conditions of directional and omnidirectional hearing aid use were studied. The results indicated that when the noise around a listener was stationary, a first- or second-order directional microphone allowed a group of hearing-impaired listeners with mild-to-moderate, bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss to perform similarly to normal hearing listeners on a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By knowing the characteristics of adaptive systems, the researchers can design the laboratory setup to maximize the directional benefit. For example, if research is designed to investigate the adaptive system of HA1 by moving noises ͑e.g., Bentler et al, 2004b͒, and if the moving noise is high frequency in spectrum, one may not see any difference between the adaptive and fixed directional modes. If a researcher used HA3 in a study, and placed the noise source at 110°͑or the corresponding azimuth angle if HA3 is mounted on a man's head͒, he/she might not see much directional benefit from this adaptive DMHA.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By knowing the characteristics of adaptive systems, the researchers can design the laboratory setup to maximize the directional benefit. For example, if research is designed to investigate the adaptive system of HA1 by moving noises ͑e.g., Bentler et al, 2004b͒, and if the moving noise is high frequency in spectrum, one may not see any difference between the adaptive and fixed directional modes. If a researcher used HA3 in a study, and placed the noise source at 110°͑or the corresponding azimuth angle if HA3 is mounted on a man's head͒, he/she might not see much directional benefit from this adaptive DMHA.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although the effectiveness of these instruments has not been observed in field trials ͑Palmer et al, 2006͒, the efficacy of the adaptive DMHA has been proven in some laboratory environments ͑Bentler et al., 2004b;Ricketts and Henry, 2002͒. Therefore, many manufacturers currently implement adaptive directional technology on newly designed hearing aids.…”
Section: B Assessing Adaptive Directional Microphone Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…None of the participants in Group HI-I had been fit with a hearing aid having directional microphone capabilities, and only two participants in Group HI-E had devices configured with directional microphones. A group of 12 adults with normal-hearing sensitivity (Group NH) was also included, and served as a standard-comparison group with respect to their increased auditory sensitivity (Jerger & Thelin, 1968;Bentler et al, 2004b). This group was included to determine the extent to which responses of listeners with normalhearing sensitivity can be generalized to listeners with mild-tomoderate sensorineural hearing impairment.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Independent research on this instrument showed encouraging findings, both for the fixed polar pattern and for the adaptive directional options. [10][11][12] In general, researchers found that the directional technology allowed for improved speech intelligibility in background noise for a variety of listening conditions. The directional optimization system in this new instrument has been expanded and has several different aspects.…”
Section: Directional Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%