2006
DOI: 10.1038/nrg1770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals

Abstract: Although the assumption of the neutral theory of molecular evolution - that some classes of mutation have too small an effect on fitness to be affected by natural selection - seems intuitively reasonable, over the past few decades the theory has been in retreat. At least in species with large populations, even synonymous mutations in exons are not neutral. By contrast, in mammals, neutrality of these mutations is still commonly assumed. However, new evidence indicates that even some synonymous mutations are su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
649
2
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 744 publications
(676 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
19
649
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We also did not consider additional measures, such as codon bias, which have been used to assess the efficacy of selection in Drosophila because, despite some evidence for selection on silent sites in primates (Comeron 2006), their applicability to primates is unclear (Duret 2002). A concern with the use of d N /d S might be that synonymous sites are not strictly neutral in primates (Chamary et al 2006;Comeron 2006). However, even if this were true, selective pressures on synonymous sites are highly unlikely to be as strong as on nonsynonymous sites (Hellmann et al 2003b;Lu and Wu 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also did not consider additional measures, such as codon bias, which have been used to assess the efficacy of selection in Drosophila because, despite some evidence for selection on silent sites in primates (Comeron 2006), their applicability to primates is unclear (Duret 2002). A concern with the use of d N /d S might be that synonymous sites are not strictly neutral in primates (Chamary et al 2006;Comeron 2006). However, even if this were true, selective pressures on synonymous sites are highly unlikely to be as strong as on nonsynonymous sites (Hellmann et al 2003b;Lu and Wu 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li 1997). Synonymous sites are thought to be neutral or nearly neutral in many species, including primates (Lu and Wu 2005); indeed, while there is some evidence that they evolve under selection (Chamary et al 2006;Comeron 2006), they tend to be much less constrained than do nonsynonymous sites (Hellmann et al 2003b). Thus, a high ratio of d N /d S (close to or greater than one) indicates relatively little constraint on replacement sites, while a lower ratio points to greater constraint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All rights reserved 4 be specific for individual host production systems (Chamary et al 2006;Gustafsson et al 2004;Plotkin & Kudla 2011).…”
Section: Acc E P Ted P R E P R I Ntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each family can consist of up to five members, for example there is one tRNA trp but five tRNA leu and these members can differ in their anticodon sequence as well as in tRNA backbone residue sequence (Goodenbour & Pan 2006).These multivalent tRNAs allow for binding to synonymous codons through movement (or 'wobble') in the 5' anti-codon. Therefore, even though there are 61 codons that encode the amino acids, fewer than 61 tRNAs are required (Cannarozzi et al 2010) Synonymous codon substitutions had originally been regarded as "silent" in nature as they did not affect the amino acid sequence of the protein, and were therefore regarded as unimportant (Chamary et al 2006). However, in the last three decades, it has become recognized that synonymous codon substitutions can have a significant effect on expression of heterologous proteins in recombinant expression systems, leading to the concept of codon optimization that may…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter has most often been assumed to reflect neutral change and has been used to normalize the mutation rates in a given gene, with the K a /K s ratio serving as an inverse measure of protein sequence conservation (Hurst 2002). More recently, the neutrality of K s has been challenged, with accumulating evidence for selection acting at synonymous sites (for reviews, see Chamary et al 2006;Xing and Lee 2006). Some of this evidence has been based on comparisons between mutation rates in predicted exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) versus control sequences, concluding that the former tend to be conserved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%