2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate and heart rate variability in emergency medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address these drawbacks, direct measurements of physiological responses such as heart rate (HR; or pulse rate [PR] when measured using photoplethysmography [PPG]), heart rate variability (HRV), electrodermal activity (EDA), skin temperature (ST), cortisol levels, blood pressure, and pupil diameter data have been investigated for assessment of stress (Greene et al, 2016) and other related constructs such as workload and arousal (Hancock & Matthews, 2019; Matthews et al, 2015). The recent evolution and availability of HR, EDA, and ST sensor technology has enabled continuous collection of physiological responses in real-world settings and has empowered naturalistic research (Healey & Picard, 2005; Jenks et al, 2020; Mehler et al, 2012; Rodrigues et al, 2015; Schneegass et al, 2013). While naturalistic studies of stress using wearable sensors (e.g., Chen et al, 2014; Giakoumis et al, 2012; Giannakakis et al, 2017; Gjoreski et al, 2017; McDuff et al, 2014) have shown promise in complementing participant self-report and simulated laboratory-based measurement, the correlations between several psycho-physiological responses used to assess stress have not been documented in unconstrained and naturalistic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address these drawbacks, direct measurements of physiological responses such as heart rate (HR; or pulse rate [PR] when measured using photoplethysmography [PPG]), heart rate variability (HRV), electrodermal activity (EDA), skin temperature (ST), cortisol levels, blood pressure, and pupil diameter data have been investigated for assessment of stress (Greene et al, 2016) and other related constructs such as workload and arousal (Hancock & Matthews, 2019; Matthews et al, 2015). The recent evolution and availability of HR, EDA, and ST sensor technology has enabled continuous collection of physiological responses in real-world settings and has empowered naturalistic research (Healey & Picard, 2005; Jenks et al, 2020; Mehler et al, 2012; Rodrigues et al, 2015; Schneegass et al, 2013). While naturalistic studies of stress using wearable sensors (e.g., Chen et al, 2014; Giakoumis et al, 2012; Giannakakis et al, 2017; Gjoreski et al, 2017; McDuff et al, 2014) have shown promise in complementing participant self-report and simulated laboratory-based measurement, the correlations between several psycho-physiological responses used to assess stress have not been documented in unconstrained and naturalistic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de Looff et al (2018) reviewed 38 articles related to occupational stress and reported a positive correlation between HR and stress; however, it was recommended that results across studies be compared with caution, as both HR (Bexton et al, 1986) and EDA (Hot et al, 1999, 2005) display diurnal variation. A recent study on emergency medicine residents’ HR data using wearable technology revealed that most participants experienced at least one episode of very high level of stress in their shifts, which was associated with maximum HR data (Jenks et al, 2020). HR has also been studied in the context of low arousal (Borghini et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other wearables are able to track dominant factors of cardiovascular function, associated with arrhythmia initiation and development, even though they do not feature specific AF detection algorithms. The E4 wristband and EmbracePlus smartwatch by Empatica, in particular, assess the heart rate variability, a measure of the autonomic nervous systems related to AF development ( 83 , 84 ). Schuurmans et al validated the performance of Empatica E4 wristband in assessing heart rate variability, underlying the need for the user to remain still, in order to achieve accurate measurements ( 72 ).…”
Section: Wearables For Detection Of Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BPM peak may suggest extra-effort or stress. Tachycardia may be indicative of mental stress, which in turn can decrease performance (Jenks et al, 2020).…”
Section: Max_bpmmentioning
confidence: 99%