2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-23506/v3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate and swimming activity as indicators of post-surgical recovery time of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

Abstract: Background: Fish telemetry using electronic transmitter or data storage tags has become a common method for studying free-swimming fish both in the wild and in aquaculture. However, fish used in telemetry studies must be handled, anaesthetised and often subjected to surgical procedures to be equipped with tags, processes that will shift the fish from their normal physiological and behavioural states. In many projects, information is needed on when the fish has recovered after handling and tagging so that only … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, DSTs can still provide valuable information, for instance in the form of high-resolution data that may shed light on fish recovery after surgery. Heart rate DSTs have shown that the heart rate of tagged Atlantic salmon did not return to baseline levels for 4 days on average (up to 6 days) after surgery and anaesthesia (Føre et al 2020). This has implications for interpretation of data from transmitters or other electronic tags, as for salmon at least, the first weeks of data may be unrepresentative of untagged fish.…”
Section: Tag Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, DSTs can still provide valuable information, for instance in the form of high-resolution data that may shed light on fish recovery after surgery. Heart rate DSTs have shown that the heart rate of tagged Atlantic salmon did not return to baseline levels for 4 days on average (up to 6 days) after surgery and anaesthesia (Føre et al 2020). This has implications for interpretation of data from transmitters or other electronic tags, as for salmon at least, the first weeks of data may be unrepresentative of untagged fish.…”
Section: Tag Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heart is innervated by the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system (Sandblom & Axelsson, 2011), which is also implicated in catecholamine release at the beginning of the stress response (Reid et al, 1998), and heart rate can increase rapidly in response to handling and other disturbances (Sopinka et al, 2016). In trial 1, natural circadian rhythms began to appear beneath the recovery trends between the 1-and 2-day marks (Figure 2), corresponding approximately with the mean recovery times which (based on our criteria) ranged from c. 29.4 to 33.5 h. The masking of circadian rhythms normally visible in ECGs can occur following elevated heart rate (see Brijs et al, 2018), though this is not always the case (Føre et al, 2021). Similar fluctuations appeared near the end of each half of trial 2 however these were less consistent than those seen in trial 1.…”
Section: Changes In Heart Rate Over Timementioning
confidence: 67%
“…In trial 1, natural circadian rhythms began to appear beneath the recovery trends between the 1‐ and 2‐day marks (Figure 2), corresponding approximately with the mean recovery times which (based on our criteria) ranged from c . 29.4 to 33.5 h. The masking of circadian rhythms normally visible in ECGs can occur following elevated heart rate (see Brijs et al , 2018), though this is not always the case (Føre et al , 2021). Similar fluctuations appeared near the end of each half of trial 2 however these were less consistent than those seen in trial 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fish recovery in terms of normalized heart rate pattern after tagging can range from days to weeks in tank trials (Hvas et al, 2020b;Føre et al, 2021;Zrini and Gamperl, 2021), and a regular diurnal heart rate cycle is often described as an indicator of a normal fish behavior and hence used as a sign fish have recovered from a tagging procedure (e.g., Brijs et al, 2019b;Føre et al, 2021). However, there is often a concern that the process of adding a tag, or the tag itself, will alter a fish's physiology so that it is no longer representative of untagged fish (Cooke et al, 2011;Jepsen et al, 2015;Macaulay et al, 2021).…”
Section: Fish Recovery and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%