2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate response after emotional picture presentation is modulated by interoceptive awareness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
152
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(114 reference statements)
21
152
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance to former data suggesting correlations between interoceptive awareness and trait anxiety [9,36,39] in this study only trait anxiety items were applied, that is items describing the individual's usual feelings. The STAI trait scale is a well-validated and reliable (Cronbach's a .73-.86) self-report measure of anxiety assessing the dispositional or more stable trait of anxiety proneness.…”
Section: Questionnaire Datamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In accordance to former data suggesting correlations between interoceptive awareness and trait anxiety [9,36,39] in this study only trait anxiety items were applied, that is items describing the individual's usual feelings. The STAI trait scale is a well-validated and reliable (Cronbach's a .73-.86) self-report measure of anxiety assessing the dispositional or more stable trait of anxiety proneness.…”
Section: Questionnaire Datamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This raises the possibility that the relationship between parasympathetic tone and fear may not be linear (but instead follows an inverted U-shaped function), or implicates additional mechanisms such as enhanced interoceptive accuracy at lower heart rates (Pollatos et al, 2007). Future Figure 2 (a) Main effect of CS (averaged across emotional condition).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A heartbeat perception score was calculated, following standard practice Pollatos, Herbert, Matthias, & Schandry, 2007), according to this formula: 1/3 Σ (1 -(|recorded heartbeats -counted heartbeats|) / recorded heartbeats). Per interval, a difference score of the number of recorded and counted heartbeats was created, which was in turn divided by the number of recorded heartbeats, subtracted from 1, summed and averaged by the number of intervals.…”
Section: Heartbeat Perception Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%