2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart rate variability and cognitive function: Effects of physical effort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
99
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
14
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The acquired results correspond to the many of literature data about the fact that the heart rate variability parameters as well as the results of their mathematical processing are reliable and informative indices for the assessment of the regulatory systems state, adaptive abilities and susceptibility to the stress influences (Antonio Luque-Casado, 2013;Luft, 2009). The investigations in this sphere have been conducting for a long time using different, constantly improving methods (Lombardi & Mortara, 1998;Ravenswaaij et al, 1993;Berntson et al, 1997, Berger et al, 1986.…”
Section: Results Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The acquired results correspond to the many of literature data about the fact that the heart rate variability parameters as well as the results of their mathematical processing are reliable and informative indices for the assessment of the regulatory systems state, adaptive abilities and susceptibility to the stress influences (Antonio Luque-Casado, 2013;Luft, 2009). The investigations in this sphere have been conducting for a long time using different, constantly improving methods (Lombardi & Mortara, 1998;Ravenswaaij et al, 1993;Berntson et al, 1997, Berger et al, 1986.…”
Section: Results Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Indeed, both the neurovisceral integration model (Thayer & Lane, 2000) and Porges’ Polyvagal theory (Porges, 1992) suggest that strong PNS activity at rest provides increased flexibility to rapidly adjust parasympathetic influence on the autonomic nervous system as called for by task demands (i.e., to effectively deploy attentional engagement or disengagement). Sustained attention has been associated with PNS withdrawal and SNS activation, as well as task performance in tests of attention and working memory (Backs & Seljos, 1994; Hansen, Johnsen, Sollers, Stenvik & Thayer, 2004; Duschek, Muckenthaler, Werner, & Reyes del Paso, 2009; Luft, Takase, & Darby, 2009; Hansen, Johnsen & Thayer 2003). Therefore, it is possible that tasks involving sustained effort or focused attention elicit larger normative reductions in CAB, and therefore more readily distinguish proband and control cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Track and field athletes were tested on a variety of executive and non-executive tasks to determine the effects of exercise on executive function, which was tested via the shifting attention test in the present study. 29 Interestingly, Stroop reaction time was the only reaction time test measured by the Stroop test that demonstrated improvements, though it is the most complex. Stroop reaction time measures the responses in the third part of the Stroop test, where a response must be given when the color of the word does not match the word written.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%