2006
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart Rate Variability as an Index of Regulated Emotional Responding

Abstract: The study of individual differences in emotional responding can provide considerable insight into interpersonal dynamics and the etiology of psychopathology. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is emerging as an objective measure of regulated emotional responding (generating emotional responses of appropriate timing and magnitude). This review provides a theoretical and empirical rationale for the use of HRV as an index of individual differences in regulated emotional responding. Two major theoretical framew… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

54
1,267
3
27

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,535 publications
(1,351 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
54
1,267
3
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Flexibility of the autonomic nervous system, indicated by alterations in both the sympathetic nervous systems (SNS) and parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) in response to stress, has been associated with better psychological adjustment (Appelhans & Luecken, 2006; Berntson, Norman, Hawkley, & Cacioppo, 2008; Thayer, Ahs, Fredrikson, Sollers, & Wager, 2012). While heightened SNS activation has been suggested to underlie the fight or flight response (Thayer & Lane, 2009), elevated PNS activation has been associated with increased concentration or a state freezing response under extreme stress (Bradley & Lang, 2007; Chou, La Marca, Steptoe, & Brewin, 2014; Hansen, Johnsen, & Thayer, 2003).…”
Section: Heart Rate Variability and Traumatic Memory Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexibility of the autonomic nervous system, indicated by alterations in both the sympathetic nervous systems (SNS) and parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) in response to stress, has been associated with better psychological adjustment (Appelhans & Luecken, 2006; Berntson, Norman, Hawkley, & Cacioppo, 2008; Thayer, Ahs, Fredrikson, Sollers, & Wager, 2012). While heightened SNS activation has been suggested to underlie the fight or flight response (Thayer & Lane, 2009), elevated PNS activation has been associated with increased concentration or a state freezing response under extreme stress (Bradley & Lang, 2007; Chou, La Marca, Steptoe, & Brewin, 2014; Hansen, Johnsen, & Thayer, 2003).…”
Section: Heart Rate Variability and Traumatic Memory Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LF reflects both SNS and PSNS activity. Thus higher HF scores indicate better moment by moment regulation (Appelhans & Luecken, 2006;Geisler & Kubiak, 2009;Taskforce). The power spectrum was analysed using a Lomb-Scargle transform (Saini, Singh, Uddin, & Kumar, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective emotion regulation requires the ability to adjust physiological arousal on a moment by moment basis (Gross & Thompson, 2007). The SNS triggers gross physiological reactions to internal and external events, fight/flight for example; while the PSNS effectively sculpts physiological reactions to be appropriately adaptive for the context (Appelhans & Luecken, 2006). Heart rate variability provides a measure of the moment by moment interaction of the SNS and PSNS yielding information about autonomic flexibility and thus regulated emotion responding.…”
Section: The Role Of Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HR values showed us a greater activation for the authoritative leader that had to face his personal change topic, highlighting some difficulties in managing a situation in which he is personally involved for his company improvement. According to literature, an increased heart rate is characteristic of a state of arousal (Appelhans & Luecken, 2006) and by the other hand, we can see a cooperative leader more quiet and with lower HR values. We know that leaders with higher emotional intelligence can also empathize more effectively with the emotion of employees and express more emotionally appropriate interactions and reactions (Mayer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Autonomic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 75%