2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-017-0415-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat and Bleach: A Cost-Efficient Method for Extracting Microplastics from Return Activated Sludge

Abstract: The extraction of plastic microparticles, so-called microplastics, from sludge is a challenging task due to the complex, highly organic material often interspersed with other benign microparticles. The current procedures for microplastic extraction from sludge are time consuming and require expensive reagents for density separation as well as large volumes of oxidizing agents for organic removal, often resulting in tiny sample sizes and thus a disproportional risk of sample bias. In this work, we present an im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The SNR of 5 in the recorded data allows us to clearly separate the polymer Raman lines from those of common biological contaminants like bacteria and microalgae [25,26,27]. While these microorganisms do have Raman lines in the spectral region used for identifying polymers, originating primarily from membranes and proteins within the cells [22,28], they are far weaker compared to the polymer Raman bands originating from the whole particle. In addition, the cell sizes of microalgae (~10 µm) and planktonic bacteria reported in drinking water (~1 µm) are well below the targeted microplastics of 100 µm, further resulting in a very weak contribution of microbial water content to the recorded Raman spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SNR of 5 in the recorded data allows us to clearly separate the polymer Raman lines from those of common biological contaminants like bacteria and microalgae [25,26,27]. While these microorganisms do have Raman lines in the spectral region used for identifying polymers, originating primarily from membranes and proteins within the cells [22,28], they are far weaker compared to the polymer Raman bands originating from the whole particle. In addition, the cell sizes of microalgae (~10 µm) and planktonic bacteria reported in drinking water (~1 µm) are well below the targeted microplastics of 100 µm, further resulting in a very weak contribution of microbial water content to the recorded Raman spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of microplastic concentrations in different study locations is given below in Table 2. Here, Sujathan et al report a very high count of microplastic particles at 4.95 × 10 5 per kg (dw) in return activated sludge from a treatment plant in Seelze, Germany [171].…”
Section: Microplastics In Sewage Sludgementioning
confidence: 89%
“…A longer digestion at higher temperature is beneficial for eliminating impurities that impede microplastic detection. However, certain polymeric materials such as polyacrylate (PA) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) can decompose and nylon 66 may melt and be lost during digestion at high temperatures [ 100 , 110 , 111 ]. Another popular oxidation method is the use of Fenton’s reagent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%