2003
DOI: 10.1021/je020042y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Capacities of α,ω-Dichloroalkanes at Temperatures from 284.15 K to 353.15 K and a Group Additivity Analysis

Abstract: Heat capacities at constant pressure of five R,ω-dichloroalkanes (1,2-dichloroethane, 1,3-dichloropropane, 1,4-dichlorobutane, 1,5-dichloropentane, 1,6-dichlorohexane) were measured at temperatures ranging from 284 K to 353 K by using a highly sensitive Tian-Calvet differential scanning microcalorimeter (DSC). Changes in the standard procedures increased the accuracy of C p measurements. The influence of the evaporation heat effect on the C p value is analyzed. In the described method, the uncertainty of the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainty of the measurements was estimated to be ±0.15% excluding the effects of sample impurities [3], however, it is interesting to note that in the opinion of Rudtsch [4] this is an optimistic estimation. Details about the apparatus and the experimental procedure have been described elsewhere [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The uncertainty of the measurements was estimated to be ±0.15% excluding the effects of sample impurities [3], however, it is interesting to note that in the opinion of Rudtsch [4] this is an optimistic estimation. Details about the apparatus and the experimental procedure have been described elsewhere [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The uncertainty of the measurements was estimated to be ±0.15% excluding the effects of sample impurities [9]. Details about the apparatus and the experimental procedure have been described elsewhere [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of the measurements was estimated to be 0.15 %. Details of the applied procedures and the calibration have been described previously [18].…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%