1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(87)90536-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat capacity measurement of U1−yGdyO2 (0.00 ≦ y ≦ 0.142) from 310 to 1500 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the heat capacity can be determined precisely (i2-3%) up to 1500 K, even for a sample of low thermal conductivity. The heat capacity values for the mixed oxide have almost similar temperature dependence to those of pure U02 up to 1500 K. It should be noted that we observed no thermal anomaly over the temperature region investigated, in contrast to the reported results of Inaba et al (16). Our results are supported by the recent report of the measurements on SIMFUEL( 17).…”
Section: ' 0'supporting
confidence: 89%
“…This indicates that the heat capacity can be determined precisely (i2-3%) up to 1500 K, even for a sample of low thermal conductivity. The heat capacity values for the mixed oxide have almost similar temperature dependence to those of pure U02 up to 1500 K. It should be noted that we observed no thermal anomaly over the temperature region investigated, in contrast to the reported results of Inaba et al (16). Our results are supported by the recent report of the measurements on SIMFUEL( 17).…”
Section: ' 0'supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Such anomalous increase in the heat capacity is usually observed when UO 2 is doped with an aliovalent cation (in this case Eu +3 , Eu +2 ). This phenomenon was reported earlier [11][12][13][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and has been ascribed to the formation of oxygen Frenkel defect pairs. An estimate of the temperature dependence of the heat capacity pertaining to the solid solutions (U 1y Eu y )O 2x (y = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6) over the temperature range 298-1800 K was obtained by extrapolating the expression derived through the least squares regression analysis of these data in the temperature range 298-900 K. This would hence forth be termed as baseline heat capacity.…”
Section: Calorimetric Measurementssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Numerical calculations show that the difference between the specific heat at constant pressure as calculated from relations (7) and (8) is significantly less than the experimental value at T < 1500 K. Therefore, the difference between the adiabatic and isothermal bulk moduli can be neglected in the calculation of the specific heat at constant pressure from relation (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Models that can be divided into numerical [7,8] and semi-empirical [9][10][11][12] have been developed on the basis of measurements of the specifi c heat of uranium dioxide at constant pressure in the temperature range 5.7-1667 K [2][3][4][5][6]. The former are not suitable for theoretical evaluations of thermophysical quantities and the fuel temperature in asymptotic limits and the latter are incorrect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation