2014
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2014-50310-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat current characteristics in nanojunctions with superconducting baths

Abstract: As a fundamental requisite for thermotronics, controlling heat flow has been a longstanding quest in solid state physics. Recently, there has been a lot of interest in nanoscale hybrid systems as possible candidates for thermal devices. In this context, we study the heat current in the simplest hybrid device of a two level system weakly coupled to two heat baths. We use the reduced density matrix approach together with a simple Born-Markov approximation to calculate the heat current in the steady state. We con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led to proposals of thermal rectifiers based on broken mirror symmetry that use a series of systems with different spectral densities. Recent examples include linear lattices 11 , superconducting junctions [12][13][14][15] , normal-superconducting junctions 16 , metallic islands 17 , quantum Hall tunnel barriers 18 , metaldielectric interfaces 19 , qubits 20,21 , or resonators 22 . Other possiblities include energy-dependent couplings 23 or the asymmetric coupling to a third reservoir acting as an environment with which the system exchanges energy [24][25][26][27][28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to proposals of thermal rectifiers based on broken mirror symmetry that use a series of systems with different spectral densities. Recent examples include linear lattices 11 , superconducting junctions [12][13][14][15] , normal-superconducting junctions 16 , metallic islands 17 , quantum Hall tunnel barriers 18 , metaldielectric interfaces 19 , qubits 20,21 , or resonators 22 . Other possiblities include energy-dependent couplings 23 or the asymmetric coupling to a third reservoir acting as an environment with which the system exchanges energy [24][25][26][27][28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the device is then controlled by an external parameter, typically a gate voltage. A requirement is the absence of mirror symmetry, which can also be introduced in the spectral properties of the contacts [30][31][32]44,45 .At low temperatures, hybrid metallic-superconducting junctions are interesting candidates as one can make use of the properties of single-electron tunneling in strongly interacting islands 46 and of the energy filtering introduced by the gap of the superconducting contacts. Here we investigate a superconducting quantum interference single-electron transistor (SQUISET), sketched in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the device is then controlled by an external parameter, typically a gate voltage. A requirement is the absence of mirror symmetry, which can also be introduced in the spectral properties of the contacts [30][31][32]44,45 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%