1969
DOI: 10.1029/jb074i015p03821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat flow, stress, and rate of slip along the San Andreas Fault, California

Abstract: The absence of a heat flow anomaly greater than ∼0.3 µcal/cm2/sec associated with the San Andreas fault is used to estimate the upper limit for the steady state or initial shear stress. Under the assumption that the long‐term rate of motion along the fault is 5 cm/yr and occurs primarily in the form of creep, this upper limit is about 100 bars. If the motion is primarily accomplished by faulting during large earthquakes and if the frictional stress is equal to the final stress as suggested by E. Orowan (1960),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
227
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
17
227
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand direct laboratory measurements (STESKY and BRACE, 1973) and deep mine fracture experiments in intact rock (SPoTTIswooD and MCGARR, 1975) indicate that the shear stress at about 10 km is 1 to 2 kbars and that stress changes of up to 1 kbar should therefore accompany faulting. On the other hand an upper limit on the average shear stress on the fault of a few hundred bars is indicated by the absence of a detectable heat flow anomaly near the San Andreas fault (BRUNE et al, 1969;LACHENBRUCH and SASS, 1973). The mean displacement-to-length ratios far earthquakes that rupture the surface also indicate an average change in stress of about 100barS (CHINNERY and PETRAK, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand direct laboratory measurements (STESKY and BRACE, 1973) and deep mine fracture experiments in intact rock (SPoTTIswooD and MCGARR, 1975) indicate that the shear stress at about 10 km is 1 to 2 kbars and that stress changes of up to 1 kbar should therefore accompany faulting. On the other hand an upper limit on the average shear stress on the fault of a few hundred bars is indicated by the absence of a detectable heat flow anomaly near the San Andreas fault (BRUNE et al, 1969;LACHENBRUCH and SASS, 1973). The mean displacement-to-length ratios far earthquakes that rupture the surface also indicate an average change in stress of about 100barS (CHINNERY and PETRAK, 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These initiatives have recovered samples of fault rock and gouge and conducted measurements of in situ stress, fluid chemistry, and temperature at depths where earthquakes nucleate. Samples and data emerging from these drilling projects provide an unparalleled opportunity to gain new insight into absolute fault strength [e.g., Brune et al, 1969;Zoback et al, 1987;Scholz, 2000;Carpenter et al, 2012], causes of apparent fault weakness [e.g., Rice, 1992;Faulkner and Rutter, 2001;Brantut et al, 2011;Gratier et al, 2011;Lockner et al, 2011], and the laws that govern fault slip and failure [e.g., Dieterich, 1979;Marone, 1998a;Ikari et al, 2009;Carpenter et al, 2011;Sone et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This magnitude of friction is hypothesized to generate large thermal anomalies on natural faults with large slip rates and/or large total displacements, assuming hydrostatic pore pressure. Curiously, analysis of surface heat flow data [e.g., Brune et al, 1969;Lachenbruch and Sass, 1980;Wang et al, 1995] and subsurface temperature profiles [Yamano and Goto, 2001;Kano et al, 2006;Tanaka et al, 2006Tanaka et al, , 2007 that cross fault zones do not show substantial, unequivocal anomalies from frictional heating. These observations prompt two questions: (1) could the frictional resistance be as large as expected from Byerlee's law and hydrostatic pore pressure, but the heat signal is masked or dissipated by other processes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%