“…Maps of basement relief and sediment thickness in this area show numerous shallowly buried basement highs (Hutnak et al, 2006;Zühlsdorff et al, 2005); basement in many of these areas would have been exposed at the seafloor prior to the last several hundred thousand years of rapid sedimentation, and areas of current basement exposure (e.g., Baby Bare outcrop) would have been larger and better connected to the ocean (Hutnak & Fisher, 2007). Larger areas of basement exposure, and the greater spatial distribution of these areas, would have been permitted more efficient regional advective heat loss, as is currently seen at the western end of the Leg 168 transect (Davis, Chapman, et al, 1992;Hutnak et al, 2006), where measured heat flow is ∼20% of lithospheric predictions, and on other ridge flanks where basement outcrops are more common (e.g., Hutnak et al, 2008;Lucazeau et al, 2006;Villinger, Grevemeyer, Kaul, Hauschild, & Pfender, 2002 , 1979) and has been revisited multiple times for logging, hydrogeological studies, and other survey work (mapping, seismics, shallow coring, and heat flow) (e.g., Becker et al, 2001;Morin, Hess, & Becker, 1992;Morin, Moos, & Hess, 1992). Processes and conditions at North Pond are likely to be typical of ridge-flank hydrothermal circulation through young crust in many settings: rapid flow of cool fluids having limited opportunity to react with basement rocks and overlying sediments before being discharged to the overlying ocean.…”