2004
DOI: 10.1080/02656730310001627704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat induced ‘masking’ of redox sensitive component(s) of the DNA-nuclear matrix anchoring complex

Abstract: The 'masking effect' is the observation that heat shock reduces or masks the apparent expression of ionizing radiation (IR) damage to DNA. The mechanism of this effect is thought to involve the aggregation of proteins to the nuclear matrix or chromatin, thereby stabilizing these structures and masking actual DNA damage from assays and presumably from DNA repair complexes. Previously, using the 'halo assay', it has been shown that nucleoids treated with 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and/or inhibited the rewinding o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A). These results are consistent with previous reports showing that hyperthermia increases NPM association with DNA in vivo (5) binds DNA in vitro (32). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A). These results are consistent with previous reports showing that hyperthermia increases NPM association with DNA in vivo (5) binds DNA in vitro (32). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Further, the enhanced association between NPM and MAR DNA was reversed in a time dependent manner during post heat incubation (Fig. 5D), typical for post heat recovery from the masking effect (5). Since the ability to rewind DNA supercoils depends upon DNA-nuclear matrix anchoring, the association of NPM with MAR DNA is consistent with the observation that the masking effect detected by the halo assay depends on NPM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…While this hypothesis is compelling, it should be noted that Goldstein et al (2013) did find a partial abrogation of H3-H4 eviction in their assay following depletion of ASF1, a separate H3-H4 histone chaperone with roles in nucleosome reassembly after UV irradiation in humans (Battu et al 2011) and DSBs in S. cerevisiae (Chen et al 2008;Kim and Haber 2009), suggesting that if NPM1 does act at DSBs, it may share this activity with other histone chaperones. In addition, others have reported contrary activities for NPM1, identifying the protein as a "shielding" factor that blocks DSB repair in heat-shocked cells, possibly through tethering of DSB-containing DNA to the nuclear matrix (Vanderwaal et al 2009;Vanderwaal and Roti Roti 2004). How these apparently contradictory D r a f t 20 observations can be resolved with the above model of NPM1 function within DSB repair remains to be seen.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The indicator cells were grown in these experiments continuously at temperatures ≤ 40 °C; therefore, the exposure conditions were quite different compared to those in consumers of hot beverages where the maximal temperatures reach 70 °C and cells are exposed for a relatively short time. It was postulated that high temperatures lead to impairment of DNA-repair processes and DNA-damage 33 35 ; in this context it is notable that Kampinga and Laszlo 33 criticized a Japanese study 36 which postulated that heat induced cell killing is caused by double strand breaks (DSBs). Our results underline the validity of this criticism and show that pronounced cytotoxicity is observed in mucosa cells already in absence of chromosomal damage (which results from DSBs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%