2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.trivac.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat stability of the Rift Valley Fever Virus Clone 13 live vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CL13T strain was also more resistant to heating than the CL13 strain. A previous study also confirmed the lack of thermostability of the CL13 vaccine strain [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CL13T strain was also more resistant to heating than the CL13 strain. A previous study also confirmed the lack of thermostability of the CL13 vaccine strain [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Live attenuated vaccines against RVF have been shown to be more efficient for disease control compared to inactivated vaccines that require an initial course of two vaccinations, followed by an annual booster vaccination [15,16]. The live-attenuated vaccines for RVF that are currently available either have safety problems, as with the Smithburn strain [23] or stability issues, as with the thermolabile CL13 vaccine [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vaccination is considered to be the most effective way to prevent and control the expansion of the disease. However, the available attenuated vaccines for RVF cause abortions and teratogenic effects (Smithburn strain vaccine) or are thermolabile (CL13 strain vaccine) [ 6 , 9 , 10 ]. An evaluation of efficacy and safety of the CL13 vaccine in ewes at different stages of pregnancy indicated that the vaccine did not induce clinical manifestation of RVF, such as abortion in pregnant ewes, teratogeny in their offspring or pyrexia in vaccinated animals [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No licensed vaccines are currently available for humans and the live RVFV virus vaccines widely used for livestock in Africa have major drawbacks, including residual virulence, need for high containment during production, and variable immunogenicity [12] . Furthermore, though available as lyophilised products, the bioactivity of these live RVFV livestock vaccines still relies on a cold chain [12] , [13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%