1971
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(71)90009-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer and friction in tubes with repeated-rib roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
252
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 647 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
23
252
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation of the numerical model by comparing the internal and external flow with experimental [22] and semi-empirical [23,24] data was developed. The pressure drop in the internal flow obtained through the numerical solution and semi-empirical [23,24] data, offers a close enough agreement, with an absolute difference of 3.25%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validation of the numerical model by comparing the internal and external flow with experimental [22] and semi-empirical [23,24] data was developed. The pressure drop in the internal flow obtained through the numerical solution and semi-empirical [23,24] data, offers a close enough agreement, with an absolute difference of 3.25%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Webb [24] used Equation (15) to calculate frictional data for turbulent flows in ribbed tubes with circular cross-section, obtaining excellent results. They found that the roughness function could be correlated as Equation (17).…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental and Semi-empirical Correlation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently, the thermal efficiency index g (see Eq. (1)), is used to quantify the effect of roughness on heat transfer and pressure drop [13].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Heat Transfer Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3][4][5] it was shown that heat transfer enhancement in tubes with annular knurling within the range of Reynolds numbers 600...3.8·10 3 may reach the factor of 1.06... 14.01. At that, the pressure loss may increase by 0.92...19.7 times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%