1984
DOI: 10.1115/1.3185932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Transfer Aspects of Nonisothermal Axisymmetric Upset Forging

Abstract: A finite difference solution for the transient heat transfer during axisymmetric upset forging has been developed. The interfacial film between the die and the billet has been included in the analysis, and all modes of heat transfer have been taken into account. The results of a parallel experimental study have also been presented. The effects of geometrical and physical characteristics of the billet and the die on the heat transfer process, particularly on die heating, have been systematically investigated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further method was based on matching the experimentally measured temperature with analytical and/or numerical solutions for various values of h. The interface heat transfer coefficient was taken to be the value which provided the best match between simulation and experimental results [23,24,26].…”
Section: Methods Used Previously For the Estimation Of The Interface mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further method was based on matching the experimentally measured temperature with analytical and/or numerical solutions for various values of h. The interface heat transfer coefficient was taken to be the value which provided the best match between simulation and experimental results [23,24,26].…”
Section: Methods Used Previously For the Estimation Of The Interface mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method was based on the solution of an inverse problem; a sequential inverse method was used to determine the thermal contact conductance in metal-forming processes [25]. A further method was based on matching the experimentally measured temperature with analytical and/or numerical solutions for various values of h. The interface heat transfer coefficient was taken to be the value which provided the best match between simulation and experimental results [23,24,26].…”
Section: Methods Used Previously For the Estimation Of The Interface Heat Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rolls were rotated in the same direction at a constant velocity n = 36 rpm, and simultaneously travelled relative to the axis of the work piece at a constant velocity v = 2.0 mm/s. The friction factor m on the material-tool contact was set to 1 [7], the material-tools heat transfer coefficient was 30 kW/m 2 K [8], while the heat transfer coefficient between the material and the environment was set to 0.35 kW/m 2 K [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulation techniques for die design have been introduced even into medium-and small-sized forging companies in Japan. For dies used in hot forging, die life is affected largely by thermal load; therefore, temperature, thermal deterioration and thermal softening of dies should be estimated [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Although significant changes in the temperature field of dies occur at the initial stage of forging or at the restart after a pause during forging, the temperature gradually achieves a steady thermal cycle after 20-30 shots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%