1983
DOI: 10.1002/er.4440070307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer characteristics of in-ground heat exchangers

Abstract: /npsi/ctrl?lang=en http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=fr Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=en NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRCThis publication could be one of several versions: author's original, accepted manuscript or the publisher's version. / La version de cette publication peut être l'une des suivantes : la version prépubli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, when the heat exchanger and soil were assumed to have the same thermal properties, the increase in the predicted heat transfer would be about 10% to 12%. The influence of the thermal resistance of the heat exchanger on heat transfer is consistent with the laboratory measurement by Svec, et al [6].…”
Section: Effect Of Interactions Between the Heat Exchanger Soil And supporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, when the heat exchanger and soil were assumed to have the same thermal properties, the increase in the predicted heat transfer would be about 10% to 12%. The influence of the thermal resistance of the heat exchanger on heat transfer is consistent with the laboratory measurement by Svec, et al [6].…”
Section: Effect Of Interactions Between the Heat Exchanger Soil And supporting
confidence: 78%
“…For instance, the specific heat extraction would be increased to 2198 and 1829 Wh/m for the 2 nd and 11 th day of January, respectively, and 5.5 Wh/m for the last day of March. Such a seemingly large influence of the thermal properties of the heat exchanger is the consequence of neglecting the thermal resistance of surrounding soil in Equation (6). By comparison, the soil thermal resistance is included when consideration is given to the full interactions between the soil and surrounding environments using Equations (1) and (2).…”
Section: Effect Of Interactions Between the Heat Exchanger Soil And mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The installation depth and exchanger configuration did not play an important role.Šedová et al [8] performed an analysis of the influence of the ground massif, the thermal resistance (conduction) of the heat exchanger piping and the thermal resistance (convection) between the exchanger pipe wall and the flowing heat-transfer fluid. Svec et al [9] dealt with the influence of the HGHE plastic piping heat resistance. They point out the results of verification of various HGHE configurations that displayed a negative influence of the exchanger pipeline resistance, which was usually neglected in the calculations and systems modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, heat and moisture transfer in shallow soil surrounding a heat exchanger is neither axi-symmetric normal to the pipe nor varying uniformly along the pipe for long term operation due to the influence of daily and seasonal climatic variations and interactions between soil and the heat exchanger. For more realistic simulation, therefore, numerical solution of a three-dimensional model is required and this type of numerical heat transfer model has been developed or applied by a number of researchers [17][18][19][20][21] to predict the performance of EAHXs. Both analytical and numerical models allow parametric analysis to be performed such as air and soil properties and pipe size but the numerical model would also enable additional parameters such as non-uniform soil properties and pipe configurations to be analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%