2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-014-1018-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer in a turbulent jet impinging on a moving plate considering high plate-to-jet velocity ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their study, as the wall-to-jet velocity ratio is lower than 0.5, the flow is slightly influenced by the motion of the wall. Aghahani et al 23 also varied the wall-to-jet velocity ratio to describe the characteristics of heat transfer between slot jets and a moving plate. As concluded in the study, at a velocity ratio of 1.25, average Nu reaches its minimum, and when the ratio exceeds 2.5, average Nu is even higher than that obtained as the plate remains stationary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their study, as the wall-to-jet velocity ratio is lower than 0.5, the flow is slightly influenced by the motion of the wall. Aghahani et al 23 also varied the wall-to-jet velocity ratio to describe the characteristics of heat transfer between slot jets and a moving plate. As concluded in the study, at a velocity ratio of 1.25, average Nu reaches its minimum, and when the ratio exceeds 2.5, average Nu is even higher than that obtained as the plate remains stationary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that for high surface-to-jet velocity ratios, no stagnation point was detected due to the complete detachment of the flow from the wall. The turbulent convective heat transfer of a slot jet impinging on a moving plate maintained at a constant temperature was numerically studied by Aghahani et al [30]. The jet Reynolds number and the effects of the surface-to-jet velocity ratio on the heat transfer were analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%