2010
DOI: 10.1002/mren.200900028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Transfer in Gas‐Phase Olefin Polymerisation: A Study of Particle/Surface Interactions

Abstract: This work focuses on the heat exchange between a polymer particle and the reactor wall for low gas velocities. The role of different wall materials (or heat transfer conditions) is investigated with an eye to understanding how this influences the likelihood of build up of wall sheeting via melting of particles. The temperature profiles inside growing polymer particles in the vicinity of the reactor wall when it is clean (steel) or covered with a layer of non‐reactive polymer are simulated. As a comparison, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the previous remarks, it can be said that the coupling between the polymerization kinetics and the flow field simulations is very weak in most heterogeneous polymerization problems. As a consequence, it seems that detailed CFD simulations can only be justified in these problems when: (i) the rates of heat and mass transfer between the suspended particles and the suspending fluid is sufficiently low, as in some gas-phase olefin polymerizations (although the particle trajectories can depend weakly on the suspending fluid properties in these cases, as discussed previously and studied by Eriksson and McKenna, 2004, and Eriksson et al, 2010); [13,17] (ii) the characteristic particle circulation time is sufficiently large, as when stagnant zones are formed inside the reaction vessel (although this can be regarded as a serious reactor design problem and should not constitute a serious problem in real commercial vessels); (iii) the reaction rates are sufficiently high and the characteristic reaction times is sufficiently small, as in reactive injection molding processes (although trajectories approach the adiabatic trajectories in this case and the coupling between the kinetics and the flow field simulations may remain weak); (iv) temperature and concentration gradients are sufficiently high inside the reaction vessel (although this can also be regarded as a serious reactor design problem and should not constitute a serious problem in real commercial vessels); (v) simulations are intended to characterize other important particle properties, such as the particle size distributions calculated with help of population balances. In short, it seems that the uniform flow field assumption (using averages to represent the reactor states) and the uniform particle states (assuming that temperatures and concentrations are uniform inside each particle) are appropriate to represent the kinetic behavior of the vast majority of the real heterogeneous polymerization processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the previous remarks, it can be said that the coupling between the polymerization kinetics and the flow field simulations is very weak in most heterogeneous polymerization problems. As a consequence, it seems that detailed CFD simulations can only be justified in these problems when: (i) the rates of heat and mass transfer between the suspended particles and the suspending fluid is sufficiently low, as in some gas-phase olefin polymerizations (although the particle trajectories can depend weakly on the suspending fluid properties in these cases, as discussed previously and studied by Eriksson and McKenna, 2004, and Eriksson et al, 2010); [13,17] (ii) the characteristic particle circulation time is sufficiently large, as when stagnant zones are formed inside the reaction vessel (although this can be regarded as a serious reactor design problem and should not constitute a serious problem in real commercial vessels); (iii) the reaction rates are sufficiently high and the characteristic reaction times is sufficiently small, as in reactive injection molding processes (although trajectories approach the adiabatic trajectories in this case and the coupling between the kinetics and the flow field simulations may remain weak); (iv) temperature and concentration gradients are sufficiently high inside the reaction vessel (although this can also be regarded as a serious reactor design problem and should not constitute a serious problem in real commercial vessels); (v) simulations are intended to characterize other important particle properties, such as the particle size distributions calculated with help of population balances. In short, it seems that the uniform flow field assumption (using averages to represent the reactor states) and the uniform particle states (assuming that temperatures and concentrations are uniform inside each particle) are appropriate to represent the kinetic behavior of the vast majority of the real heterogeneous polymerization processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Second, the resistance to heat and mass transfer between the medium and the particle may not be negligible. [13,17] In this case, the fluctuations in temperature and concentration of the medium can be mitigated by the limited exchange capacity of the system, causing the particle to experience fluctuations in temperature and concentration that are much lower than those observed in the suspending fluid. Besides, in these cases, the evolution of temperatures and concentrations inside the particles can be much less sensitive to the suspending fluid conditions.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysis Of Characteristic Time Constantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Em trabalhos recentes, McKenna et al [31,48,49] e Eriksson et al [50,51] utilizaram fluido dinâmica computacional para avaliar o efeito dos mecanismos de transferência de massa e calor sobre o processo de polimerização, levando em consideração a influência do tamanho e conformação (relativo a posição e ao contato mútuo) das partículas de catalisador no meio reacional. De forma geral, os gradientes de calor e massa devem ser minimizados durante a operação normal do processo, o que resulta na necessidade de realizar um estágio de pré-polimerização no processo, para diluir a atividade do catalisador por volume de partícula.…”
Section: Morfologia Das Partículas De Polímerounclassified