2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer performance of flag vortex generators in rectangular channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
(542 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also shown are corresponding values of the thermal effectiveness factor ηgoodbreak=()Nureed/Nureedless/trueW˙italicreed/trueW˙italicreedless1/3 where we have recognized that at fixed Re , the mechanical power dissipation rate is proportional to the friction factor, so that η is identical to the quantity used by Shoele and Mittal [ 15 ] and Gallegos and Sharma. [ 25,26 ] For Lreed/W=2 and 2.5, we see that Nureed/Nureedless, W˙reed/W˙reedless, and η decrease downstream, as would be expected, based on the fact that the enhancement in these single‐reed cases is localized near the inlet. At each streamwise position, the values of these three quantities are higher for Lreed/W=2.5 than for Lreed/W=2, as would be expected.…”
Section: Computationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Also shown are corresponding values of the thermal effectiveness factor ηgoodbreak=()Nureed/Nureedless/trueW˙italicreed/trueW˙italicreedless1/3 where we have recognized that at fixed Re , the mechanical power dissipation rate is proportional to the friction factor, so that η is identical to the quantity used by Shoele and Mittal [ 15 ] and Gallegos and Sharma. [ 25,26 ] For Lreed/W=2 and 2.5, we see that Nureed/Nureedless, W˙reed/W˙reedless, and η decrease downstream, as would be expected, based on the fact that the enhancement in these single‐reed cases is localized near the inlet. At each streamwise position, the values of these three quantities are higher for Lreed/W=2.5 than for Lreed/W=2, as would be expected.…”
Section: Computationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This indicates that the degree of interaction is related to the strip width in this study. As the principle of using a flexible vortex generator to enhance heat transfer is the enhanced flow unsteadiness due to fluid-structure interactions [20,[33][34][35], stronger fluidstructure interactions induce better heat dissipation effect in non-fully-turbulent flow. A moderate strip width, which is 1 cm for the 1-4 flag in this study, provides the strongest interaction among all the studied cases, thus leads to the optimal heat dissipation effect.…”
Section: High-speed Camera Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a number of studies that employed fluid-structure interaction of flexible structures [14][15][16][17] coupled with heat convection have been published [18][19][20][21]. Shi et al [22] used a thin film behind a cylinder in a channel flow to study the effect of flutter-induced vortex on heat transfer in a numerical way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical results showed that mixing is enhanced for larger flaps displacement, such that 99% improvement was seen in the rate of the mixing process. The performance of flag vortex generators in increasing heat transfer rate in convection duct flow was studied experimentally by Kristoffer et al [11]. In that study, the heat transfer characteristics of turbulent convection airflow under the presence of a flapping flag as a VG were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%