2017
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat wave exposure in India in current, 1.5 °C, and 2.0 °C worlds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
110
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The few existing studies that performed similar analysis found that a shift from a high to a low radiative forcing pathway led to greater reduction in exposure than a shift from a high to a low population growth pathway. This holds true at the global scale (Jones et al, ) but also (i) in the United States, where Jones et al () found that a shift to a lower emission pathway or to a lower population growth pathway would reduce exposure by ~56% and ~45%, respectively; (ii) in India, where Mishra et al () showed that a shift from high to low population growth has a lower influence on exposure than a shift from +2 to +1.5 °C; (iii) in Eastern Africa, where Harrington and Otto () found that shifting from +2 to +1.5 °C would reduce exposure by ~81%, whereas shifting from a medium (SSP2) to low (SSP1) population growth pathway would reduce exposure by ~28%; and (iv) in North Africa/Middle East and Sub‐Saharan Africa, where Jones et al () demonstrated that a shift from a high (SSP3) to low (SSP5) population growth pathway would lead to a lesser reduction in exposure than a shift from a high (RCP8.5) to low (RCP4.5) emission pathway (~33–39% vs. ~47–57%). Our results—while not entirely comparable because based on different population projections, HI, and scenarios range—differ slightly from those found in the literature in that a shift from a high to a low urban population growth pathway leads to a slightly greater reduction in exposure than a shift from a high to a low emission pathway (~51% vs ~48%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The few existing studies that performed similar analysis found that a shift from a high to a low radiative forcing pathway led to greater reduction in exposure than a shift from a high to a low population growth pathway. This holds true at the global scale (Jones et al, ) but also (i) in the United States, where Jones et al () found that a shift to a lower emission pathway or to a lower population growth pathway would reduce exposure by ~56% and ~45%, respectively; (ii) in India, where Mishra et al () showed that a shift from high to low population growth has a lower influence on exposure than a shift from +2 to +1.5 °C; (iii) in Eastern Africa, where Harrington and Otto () found that shifting from +2 to +1.5 °C would reduce exposure by ~81%, whereas shifting from a medium (SSP2) to low (SSP1) population growth pathway would reduce exposure by ~28%; and (iv) in North Africa/Middle East and Sub‐Saharan Africa, where Jones et al () demonstrated that a shift from a high (SSP3) to low (SSP5) population growth pathway would lead to a lesser reduction in exposure than a shift from a high (RCP8.5) to low (RCP4.5) emission pathway (~33–39% vs. ~47–57%). Our results—while not entirely comparable because based on different population projections, HI, and scenarios range—differ slightly from those found in the literature in that a shift from a high to a low urban population growth pathway leads to a slightly greater reduction in exposure than a shift from a high to a low emission pathway (~51% vs ~48%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recognising that more-frequent and more-intense climate extremes will often lead to substantially higher impacts when they occur in highly populated areas, recent research has focused on the implications of future changes to heat extremes for specific regions of interest (Im et al 2017, Mishra et al 2017, Russo et al 2017, Jones et al 2015, Pal and Eltahir 2016. However, multiple lines of evidence also demonstrate that different regions of the world can experience substantially different rates of emergent climate change given the same amount of global mean warming (Mahlstein et al 2011, Diffenbaugh and Scherer 2011, Hawkins and Sutton 2012, Harrington et al 2016, Diffenbaugh and Charland 2016, Davis and Diffenbaugh 2016, Herold et al 2017, Frame et al 2017, Harrington et al 2017, Mora et al 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of literature has suggested that future GHG increases will very likely enhance the duration, intensity, and frequency of heat extremes across the world (Jones et al, 2015;Lau & Nath, 2014;Meehl & Tebaldi, 2004;Mishra et al, 2017;Mora et al, 2017;Russo et al, 2014;Schär, 2016;Schoetter et al, 2015). However, very little attention has been devoted to contrasting the roles of future GHG increases and aerosol reductions in future heatwave characteristic projections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%