1978
DOI: 10.1021/je60077a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heats of formation and bond dissociation energies of some simple sulfur- and halogen-containing molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the S-S BDE of ClS-SCl is 78.8 kcal/mol reported by Claydon through heats of formation measured by calorimeters, [14] but 46 ± 7 kcal/mol measured with equivalent method in Takacs' study. [15] Similar observations have also been noted for the S-S BDE of Ph-S-S-Ph reported by Bausch [16] and Hoff et al [17] (55 ± 2 kcal/mol with electrochemistry method and 43 kcal/mol based on the enthalpy of hydrogenation with scanning calorimetry). Alternatively, theoretical methods have also been used to evaluate the S-S BDEs of disulfides.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the S-S BDE of ClS-SCl is 78.8 kcal/mol reported by Claydon through heats of formation measured by calorimeters, [14] but 46 ± 7 kcal/mol measured with equivalent method in Takacs' study. [15] Similar observations have also been noted for the S-S BDE of Ph-S-S-Ph reported by Bausch [16] and Hoff et al [17] (55 ± 2 kcal/mol with electrochemistry method and 43 kcal/mol based on the enthalpy of hydrogenation with scanning calorimetry). Alternatively, theoretical methods have also been used to evaluate the S-S BDEs of disulfides.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, the different experimental methods in these studies may give distinct BDEs. For example, the S―S BDE of ClS–SCl is 78.8 kcal/mol reported by Claydon through heats of formation measured by calorimeters, but 46 ± 7 kcal/mol measured with equivalent method in Takacs' study . Similar observations have also been noted for the S―S BDE of Ph–S–S–Ph reported by Bausch and Hoff et al (55 ± 2 kcal/mol with electrochemistry method and 43 kcal/mol based on the enthalpy of hydrogenation with scanning calorimetry).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our value of ∆ f H o (FSO 2 ) ϭ Ϫ96.2 Ϯ 3.0 kcal mol Ϫ1 differs strongly from those estimated by Takacs, Ϫ117 Ϯ 5 kcal mol Ϫ1 [13], Sudlow and Woolf, Ϫ110 kcal mol Ϫ1 [17] and Li, Ϫ81.8 kcal mol Ϫ1 [12]. However, within the combined stated errors, our result is in reasonable agreement with the value recommended by Herron of Ϫ102 Ϯ 4 kcal mol Ϫ1 [15].…”
Section: ) 2 Ch3oϩsh2ϩsfϩh2so4supporting
confidence: 73%
“…[17] The difference is of similarly large magnitude (41 kcal mol À1 ) in comparing the bond strengths of S À F vs. S À Cl bonds in SO 2 FCl. [18] These factors produce a surprising and highly useful passivity in the -SO 2 F group. A small gem of comparative observation was provided more than 40 years ago by gas chromatography analysis of sulfonyl halides, showing directly the thermal and hydrolytic fragility of RSO 2 Cl compared to RSO 2 F. [19] An even earlier and more striking case from Steinkopf and Jaeger described the Ullmann coupling of iodo-3-fluorosulfonylbenzenes over metallic copper powder at elevated temperatures, without decomposition of the SO 2 F group [Eq.…”
Section: Organic Sulfonyl Fluorides and Their Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%