2019
DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2019.1632554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heaven on Earth: The Mind Uploading Project as Secular Eschatology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theologians critiquing this position, such as Brent Waters (2011), Leandro Gaitán (2019), and Jason Eberl (2022), typically employ a strategy whose first step is to point out that these secular eschatologies rest on mind-body structures handed down to them through the Western-Christian tradition (i.e., that the true, inner person is a separate thing from the body, and that this disembodied essence needs saving from the finite and corruptible flesh). Only, and this is usually the second step, this dualistic premise underlining the whole project smacks of heretical ideas, beginning with Manichean loathing of the body, Gnostic privileged wisdom, or Pelagian belief in self-perfection (Waters 2010).…”
Section: The Body In Theological Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theologians critiquing this position, such as Brent Waters (2011), Leandro Gaitán (2019), and Jason Eberl (2022), typically employ a strategy whose first step is to point out that these secular eschatologies rest on mind-body structures handed down to them through the Western-Christian tradition (i.e., that the true, inner person is a separate thing from the body, and that this disembodied essence needs saving from the finite and corruptible flesh). Only, and this is usually the second step, this dualistic premise underlining the whole project smacks of heretical ideas, beginning with Manichean loathing of the body, Gnostic privileged wisdom, or Pelagian belief in self-perfection (Waters 2010).…”
Section: The Body In Theological Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is not easy to set the limits of morality or pronounce what moral wrong is, it appears that-as Newton's story shows-the experience of suffering or misery, and especially misery of the most vulnerable, may serve as a "boundary stone." Limitations-not only physical, but also and above all moral-are statements about man, since they express our fundamental finiteness, fragility and fallibility (Gaitán 2019;Szopa 2021).…”
Section: Forgiveness and Theologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For readers who may not be following this literature closely, a representative sample of articles (published just within the past five years) should provide some indication of the marked interest in these topics: Anderson (2019); Benders (2018); Cannon (2015); Cole‐Turner (2015; 2018); Cruz (2015); Dumsday (2017); Fullam (2018); Gaitán (2019); Gallaher (2019); Gocke (2017); Gouw (2018; 2019); Green (2015; 2016; 2018); Ham (2016); Herzfeld (2016); Jong (2018); Jung (2019); Kellogg (2015); Kostick, Fowler and Scott (2019); LaTorra (2015); Lorrimar (2019); Mercer (2015); Miletić (2015); Molhoek (2016; 2018); Peters (2015; 2018; 2019); Singler (2019); Tirosh‐Samuelson (2018); Walker (2018); Weissenbacher (2018); Willows (2017); and Woloschak (2018). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%