1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.8267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-hole and light-hole oscillations in the coherent emission from quantum wells: Evidence for exciton-exciton correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that EIS also contributes strongly to the coupling. In addition, coupling between opposite spin excitons has been studied by time resolving beats between heavy and light holes 19 and by observing Raman coherences. 41,42 The time-resolved results were well produced by a phenomenological model that included EID as the coupling mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that EIS also contributes strongly to the coupling. In addition, coupling between opposite spin excitons has been studied by time resolving beats between heavy and light holes 19 and by observing Raman coherences. 41,42 The time-resolved results were well produced by a phenomenological model that included EID as the coupling mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 The phenomenological approach yields corrections to the OBE's, which can produce very good agreement with experiment 18 including complex polarization selection rules. 19 While the full many-body treatment is clearly based on a stronger theoretical foundation, the phenomenological description is usually easier to understand in terms of the underlying physics. The foundation provided by the full many-body treatment has been used to develop a microscopic basis for the phenomenological few level approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…expected for cocircular-polarized excitation. Previous FWM [131], spectrally-resolved differential transmission [132], and coherent excitation spectroscopy [129] studies have shown that indeed coupling does occur in cocircular-polarized excitation, attributing it to many-body correlations. Experimental 2D spectra of both rephasing and nonrephasing pathways with cocircular-polarized excitation are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Excitation Dependence Of 2d Spectramentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The splitting between the heavy-hole (hh) and light-hole (lh) excitons is 7.3 meV for one sample and ^ 12 meV for the other. All of the TRE measurements described in [24,51,52] were performed with the 7.3 meV sample, and the POLLIWOG measurements described in this chapter and in [53][54][55][56][57][58] used the % 12 meV sample. This difference in the hh-lh splittings is the only measurable distinction between the two samples that we have observed, and it is most likely the result of differing in-plane strains introduced when the samples are cooled.…”
Section: Polliwog Measurements Ofhh Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%