2021
DOI: 10.3329/bjz.v49i2.56257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy Metal Concentrations and Human Health Risk Assessment of Selected Wild and Cultured Fishes of Bangladesh

Abstract: This study was conducted to estimate the concentration of selected heavy metals such as chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb) as well as the possible risk to consumer health from the flesh of three wild and cultured fishes (Labeo rohita, Mystus cavasius, and Heteropneustes fossilis) collected from the Meghna river, Narayangonj and Rajoir fish farm, Madaripur district respectively. Heavy metal concentrations were determined using Atomic Abso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The THQ value indicates the potential non-carcinogenic risk of heavy metal consumption, and it is desired to be less than 1. The THQ values for Pb, Co, Cr, Cd, and Ni in this study were within this acceptable limit and posed no serious non-carcinogenic health upon consumption of individual heavy metals and in accordance with earlier studies (Ahmed et al, 2019;Akter et al, 2021). However, a number of heavy metals are simultaneously contained within the fish muscle; therefore, HI values should be taken into consideration while estimating non-carcinogenic risk as it is more representative of the actual scenario of heavy metal consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The THQ value indicates the potential non-carcinogenic risk of heavy metal consumption, and it is desired to be less than 1. The THQ values for Pb, Co, Cr, Cd, and Ni in this study were within this acceptable limit and posed no serious non-carcinogenic health upon consumption of individual heavy metals and in accordance with earlier studies (Ahmed et al, 2019;Akter et al, 2021). However, a number of heavy metals are simultaneously contained within the fish muscle; therefore, HI values should be taken into consideration while estimating non-carcinogenic risk as it is more representative of the actual scenario of heavy metal consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All the THQ values obtained in this investigation were below 1 and implied that the possible non-carcinogenic health hazards due to prolonged fish consumption are negligible (Table 6). Similar assumptions have been proposed by Sarker et al (2020) and Akter et al (2021). However, the HI values demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the studied heavy metals is likely to impart hazardous effects on human health under long-term exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The mean concentrations of Mn in fish species except (W. attu and L. rohita) were higher than the MAC value of 1.0 mg/kg recommended by FAO/WHO (2002). Manganese contents, as evident from Table 3, in this study were comparatively higher than those reported from cities/countries like Dhaka/Bangladesh (Akter et al, 2021), Asafo/Ghana (Kwaansa-Ansah et al, 2019) and Olsztyn/Poland (Luczynska et al, 2022). The environmental contamination of Mn includes anthropogenic sources such as municipal wastewater discharges, sewage sludge, mining, and mineral processing, emissions from alloy, steel, and iron production, combustion of fossil fuels, and, to a much lesser extent, emissions from the combustion of fuel additives (Honeyman & Santschi, 1988;Cima, 2019).…”
Section: Heavy Metals (Hms) Concentration In Fish Speciescontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…However, predators or scavengers would be at risk from the consumption of C. catla and C. batrachus since these two species measured levels of Cr above the permissible limit. Table 3 shows lower Cd contents in fish species in cities/countries like Dhaka/Bangladesh (Akter et al, 2021), Dalmai/Iraq (Al-Sulttani et al, 2022), and Aba/Nigeria (Chima et al, 2022) compared to the present study. Chromium (VI) is a non-essential and toxic element whereas Cr (III) is an essential trace element, although it can cause toxicity in high doses.…”
Section: Heavy Metals (Hms) Concentration In Fish Speciescontrasting
confidence: 41%