2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metal distribution in soil aggregates: a comparison of recent and archived aggregates from Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the determination of the water content, field‐moist samples were dried at 105°C until they reached constant weight. To measure total acid‐soluble As, Pb, Fe, Mn, and Al the soil was digested with concentrated HNO 3 in closed vessels (two replicates), following the procedure described by Ilg et al (2004) The digested samples were filtered, transferred into volumetric flasks and filled to the volume with deionized water. This solution was analyzed as described in the analysis section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the determination of the water content, field‐moist samples were dried at 105°C until they reached constant weight. To measure total acid‐soluble As, Pb, Fe, Mn, and Al the soil was digested with concentrated HNO 3 in closed vessels (two replicates), following the procedure described by Ilg et al (2004) The digested samples were filtered, transferred into volumetric flasks and filled to the volume with deionized water. This solution was analyzed as described in the analysis section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may not rule out that the soils have been contaminated by deposition from the air and will consider the possible error in our discussion. The identity of the archived and recently collected samples at Lesnaja Dacha, Bronnitsi, and Nenashevo has been previously proven by detailed analysis of the mineralogical composition (Ilg et al, 2004). Although this early soil sampling was not designed to capture the spatial variation, we consider the opportunity to study these samples as unique because they contain important information on a climatic region, which is clearly underexplored with respect to the dynamics of persistent organic pollutants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the determination of the water content, field-moist samples were dried at 105°C until they reached constant weight. To measure total acid-soluble Fe and Pb concentrations the soil was digested in closed vessels (two replicates), following the procedure described by Ilg et al (2004). Ten millilitres of concentrated nitric acid were added to 2 g of field-moist soil.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Soil Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%