1992
DOI: 10.1128/aem.58.5.1592-1600.1992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metals alter the electrokinetic properties of bacteria, yeasts, and clay minerals

Abstract: The electrokinetic patterns of four bacterial species (Bacillus subtilis, BaciUlus megaterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Agrobacterium radiobacter), two yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans), and two clay minerals (montmorillonite and kaolinite) in the presence of the chloride salts of the heavy metals, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn, and of Na and Mg were determined by microelectrophoresis. The cells and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With a further rise in pH, uranium sorption by lyophilized biomass showed a sharp decline, while the living counterpart seemed less affected. The observed trend with regard to pH (ie low uranium uptake by bacterial biomass increasing with pH from acidic to near neutral conditions) may be explained by (i) the high solubility of uranyl ions and competition by H + for uranium binding sites in the acidic conditions,3 (ii) increasing binding affinity by the biomass of monovalent uranyl species (UO 2 OH + , (UO 2 ) 3 (OH) 5 + ) formed at higher pH (pH 4.0–5.0) over the divalent (UO 2 2+ ) at low pH (pH 2.0)26 and (iii) decrease in dissolved uranyl ion concentration at higher pH due to the formation of solid schoepite (4UO 3 9H 2 O) reducing uranium sorption 9. 27 Such a trend has also been observed previously in P aeruginosa CSU,3 Rhizopus arrhizus, Streptomyces levoris 28 and S longwoodensis ,29 suggesting a redox range between pH 4.0 and 5.0 for maximum uranium sorption 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a further rise in pH, uranium sorption by lyophilized biomass showed a sharp decline, while the living counterpart seemed less affected. The observed trend with regard to pH (ie low uranium uptake by bacterial biomass increasing with pH from acidic to near neutral conditions) may be explained by (i) the high solubility of uranyl ions and competition by H + for uranium binding sites in the acidic conditions,3 (ii) increasing binding affinity by the biomass of monovalent uranyl species (UO 2 OH + , (UO 2 ) 3 (OH) 5 + ) formed at higher pH (pH 4.0–5.0) over the divalent (UO 2 2+ ) at low pH (pH 2.0)26 and (iii) decrease in dissolved uranyl ion concentration at higher pH due to the formation of solid schoepite (4UO 3 9H 2 O) reducing uranium sorption 9. 27 Such a trend has also been observed previously in P aeruginosa CSU,3 Rhizopus arrhizus, Streptomyces levoris 28 and S longwoodensis ,29 suggesting a redox range between pH 4.0 and 5.0 for maximum uranium sorption 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Solution pH strongly in£uences the characteristics of the cell envelope [10,28,29] and metal chemistry [1]. Changes in both these tend to alter metal binding at bacterial surfaces [10,30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorptive interactions between particles of the same charge have frequently been considered in terms of the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeck (DLVO) theory of colloid stability (24). Although the DLVO theory has been applied to (5,14,17,29,30), numerous complications arise because cells are not nonpermeable objects of well-defined structure and surface topography. One must know the value of the surface potential to calculate the electrostatic repulsion forces.…”
Section: And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%