2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metals in sediments and uptake by burrowing mayflies in western Lake Erie basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our study showed that concentrations of the coal ash-associated contaminants As and Se were higher in all the sample matrices including snails and mayflies at ash-affected 2: Biomagnification factors (BMFs) calculated as the ratio between the average concentrations of each trace element (expressed as parts per million dry wt) in the biota (i.e., mayfly nymphs and adult snails) and the average concentration of each trace element (expressed as parts per million dry wt) in their respective food resources (i.e., sediment and periphyton) a sites than at the reference sites, major remediation activities removed much of the spilled ash from the site in 2010 and 2011; and as a result, trace element concentrations in mayfly nymphs were shown to decrease in the 4 yr following the spill (Smith et al 2016). Overall, concentrations of trace elements associated with coal ash measured in mayfly nymphs in the present study remained similar to the ones reported in mayflies in other sites (Cid et al 2010;Opfer et al 2011;Fletcher et al 2014Fletcher et al , 2017. It is always complex to address the risks associated with trace elements on aquatic biota based solely on their concentrations because many factors can significantly affect trace element bioavailability and toxicity and, therefore, the consequences on the invertebrate populations (e.g., Mathews et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although our study showed that concentrations of the coal ash-associated contaminants As and Se were higher in all the sample matrices including snails and mayflies at ash-affected 2: Biomagnification factors (BMFs) calculated as the ratio between the average concentrations of each trace element (expressed as parts per million dry wt) in the biota (i.e., mayfly nymphs and adult snails) and the average concentration of each trace element (expressed as parts per million dry wt) in their respective food resources (i.e., sediment and periphyton) a sites than at the reference sites, major remediation activities removed much of the spilled ash from the site in 2010 and 2011; and as a result, trace element concentrations in mayfly nymphs were shown to decrease in the 4 yr following the spill (Smith et al 2016). Overall, concentrations of trace elements associated with coal ash measured in mayfly nymphs in the present study remained similar to the ones reported in mayflies in other sites (Cid et al 2010;Opfer et al 2011;Fletcher et al 2014Fletcher et al , 2017. It is always complex to address the risks associated with trace elements on aquatic biota based solely on their concentrations because many factors can significantly affect trace element bioavailability and toxicity and, therefore, the consequences on the invertebrate populations (e.g., Mathews et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Their values remained near the background levels in the basal 10-cm section (prior to 1880), increased gradually until 1950, increased rapidly between 1950 and 1970, and subsequently decreased towards the sediment-water interface. The trace metal concentrations of the core-top sediments are comparable with those measured on surficial sediments in the western basin 29 30 ( Table 1 ). Our sediment chronology is in good agreement with previously published Pb records from the central (C94) 16 and eastern (E91) 18 basins ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…All water samples were stabilized in the field with two percent (by volume) trace-metals grade nitric acid. Unfiltered water samples were digested according to USEPA Method 3015A (Microwave-Assisted Acid Digestion of Aqueous Samples and Extracts, USEPA 2007) using a microwave system (CEM MARSXpress, CEM Corp., Matthews, NC), and a leaching technique that results in the extraction of bioavailable metals (Opfer et al 2011). Copper concentrations were determined following USEPA Method 6010C (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry, USEPA 2007) using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrophotometer (ThermoElectron iCAP 6500 Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA).…”
Section: Quantifying Copper Fractionation and Zooplankton Community Cmentioning
confidence: 99%