2007
DOI: 10.1065/espr2006.10.355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metals in untreated/treated urban effluent and sludge from a biological wastewater treatment plant

Abstract: According to the current metal levels, RP-BWTP sludge might be used for agriculture purposes. However, for an environmentally safe use of sewage sludge, further studies including systematic monitoring are recommended. Annual metal concentrations and predicted variations of those elements in the sludge should be monitored.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared with heavy metal levels reported in literature for sludge collected from various WWTPs, our results (Table 1) are in good agreement with those found for Kavala by other authors [25,33], are comparable with findings for Kalamata [22], Komotini [23] and Crete [21] in Greece, for Spain [18,28,38], Poland [13,27] and Brasil [34,37], and are much lower than the values obtained for Greece at the largest WWTPs of Athens (Psyttalia and Metamorphosi) [33] and Thessaloniki [4], and also for China [35,36] and Thailand [7], probably due to the fact that the WWTPs in this study only receive domestic wastewater, while industrial wastes processed in other stations usually contain higher levels of heavy metals than residential wastes [39].…”
Section: Metal Levels In Greek Wwtps Sludgesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As compared with heavy metal levels reported in literature for sludge collected from various WWTPs, our results (Table 1) are in good agreement with those found for Kavala by other authors [25,33], are comparable with findings for Kalamata [22], Komotini [23] and Crete [21] in Greece, for Spain [18,28,38], Poland [13,27] and Brasil [34,37], and are much lower than the values obtained for Greece at the largest WWTPs of Athens (Psyttalia and Metamorphosi) [33] and Thessaloniki [4], and also for China [35,36] and Thailand [7], probably due to the fact that the WWTPs in this study only receive domestic wastewater, while industrial wastes processed in other stations usually contain higher levels of heavy metals than residential wastes [39].…”
Section: Metal Levels In Greek Wwtps Sludgesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…From Table 1 it can be noticed that the heavy metal contents of the investigated sludge samples are site-specific and for most elements vary by the period of the sample collection, demonstrating that the accumulation of metals in sewage sludge produced in a WWTP which serves a specific area is an intricate process, depending upon local factors, such as population lifestyle, irregularity of raw sewage inputs from urban sources, influents' composition, as well as the treatment performance of each plant [5,7,9,14,34].…”
Section: Metal Levels In Greek Wwtps Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of metals in wastewater treatment is reported to be highly variable (Chipasa, 2003;Da Silva Oliveira et al, 2007). However, the mechanisms of removal are thought to be similar in the two main process types; a few publications found in the literature support the opinion that TF is less effective than AS (Ziolko et al, 2009;Santos et al, 2010).…”
Section: Fate Of Pollutants In Wastewater Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In contrast, the B concentrations in the TWW at the two sites were relatively high. The low concentrations of the studied heavy metals was mainly because they are mostly associated with suspended solids in municipal wastewater (Brown and Lester, 1979), and as a consequence, secondary treatment schemes tend to exhibit high rates of heavy metal removal (Ben-Hur, 2004;Oliveira et al, 2007). Sources of B in domestic wastewater include mainly human excretions and detergents and laundry powders, and its removal rate in the secondary treatment plant is very low (Ben-Hur, 2004); consequently, its concentrations in the secondary TWW were relatively high ( Table 2).…”
Section: Macronutrientsmentioning
confidence: 97%