1992
DOI: 10.1016/0160-4120(92)90111-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metals release from ash pond to soil water environment: A simulated technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sr and Ca showed progressively lower concentrations in leachates with increasing pH. These results are consistent with previous laboratory leaching experiments ,, . The differential LCACs mobilization generated large variations in the contaminants’ ratios (e.g., As/B, Se/As; Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sr and Ca showed progressively lower concentrations in leachates with increasing pH. These results are consistent with previous laboratory leaching experiments ,, . The differential LCACs mobilization generated large variations in the contaminants’ ratios (e.g., As/B, Se/As; Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The high concentrations of LCACs in CCRs and their enhanced mobility in aquatic systems are the key factors for evaluating potential risks of CCRs to the environment. The TVA spill has provided a unique opportunity to examine these effects on a regional field scale, beyond laboratory leaching tests , . The objectives of this study are (1) to provide a systematic 18-month monitoring survey of the environmental impacts following the TVA coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee; (2) to examine the composition of major constituents and trace metals in water samples from different sites associated with the ash spill, including upstream and downstream river waters, tributary waters, and porewater extracted from the river sediments; (3) to conduct laboratory leaching experiments on the TVA coal ash for evaluating the factors that control LCACs composition and mobilization; (4) to examine the possible river quality impacts upon dredging of the ash from the rivers, which was part of the major remediation plan by TVA ; and (5) to evaluate the impact of redox conditions that prevail in river sediments on the reactivity of coal ash in the environment, particularly for arsenic mobilization and species distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the processes of oxidation and corrosion, these metals will dissolved in rain water and leached into soil from where they are picked up by growing plants thereby entering the food chain 3 . Improper wastes management methods also pilot the contamination of underground water 4,5 while most of the metals are being washed away by runoff into streams and rivers thereby contaminating the marine environment 6 . Consequently, these metals accumulate in fish and other aquatic organisms, thus posing a health threat to the consumers 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH of the fly ash tends to vary from acidic to alkaline (4.5 to 12.0), depending on the source of coal and the number of trace elements in them [48]. Fly ash produced from bituminous coal, is mostly acidic even though it has higher sulfur content, while alkaline fly ash is produced from the sub-bituminous coal, which has lower sulfur content, and has higher Ca and Mg content than that derived from bituminous coal [49]. Similarly the electrical conductivity (EC) of fly ash varies between 0.177 to 14 S/m, which directly corresponds to the quantitative concentration of soluble cations and anions in the fly ash [2,50].…”
Section: Chemical Properties Of Fly Ashmentioning
confidence: 99%