2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5021-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-quark form factors in the large $$\beta _0$$ β 0 limit

Abstract: Heavy-quark form factors are calculated at β 0 α s ∼ 1 to all orders in α s at the first order in 1/β 0 . Using the inversion relation generalized to vertex functions, we reduce the massive on-shell Feynman integral to the HQET one. This HQET vertex integral can be expressed via a 2 F 1 function; the nth term of its ε expansion is explicitly known. We confirm existing results for n L−1 l α L s terms in the form factors (up to L = 3), and we present results for higher L.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[47]. The large β 0 limit for massive form factors has been considered in [56] and in [57], where the three-loop scalar and pseudo-scalar form factors were computed in the static limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47]. The large β 0 limit for massive form factors has been considered in [56] and in [57], where the three-loop scalar and pseudo-scalar form factors were computed in the static limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a parallel and independent computation in [16], the authors also have obtained both the colorplanar and complete light quark non-singlet three-loop massive form factors for the aforementioned currents. In [17], the large β 0 limit has been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) via the 2 F 1 function whose ε expansion is known to all orders [12]. The expansion in euclidean case is given there (there is a typo in the journal version corrected in the version 4 in arXiv); the Minkowski case is given by the formula (41) in [13]. Our result (22) at l 1 ¼ l 2 ¼ 0 agrees with the formula (B.10) in [13] (it contains 3 further expansion terms).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%