2010
DOI: 10.1177/0142723709350529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hebrew Adjectives in Later Language Text Production

Abstract: The study investigates the distribution and use of adjectives in 252 texts produced by 63 Hebrew-speaking children, adolescents, and adults who were asked to tell and write a story about a personal fight or a quarrel, and to present a talk and write an expository text on the topic of school violence. All adjective types and tokens in each text were identified, counted, classified, and analyzed using semantic, morphological, and syntactic criteria. Findings show that the adjective class grows larger, richer, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
28
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with spoken texts, Hebrew written texts were found to be informationally denser, lexically richer and more diverse, as well as containing more high-register lexical items and morphological constructions (Berman & Nir 2011;, fewer repetitions, false starts, hedges, and other disfluencies (Ravid & Berman 2006). Written texts also contained more abstract and morphologically complex nominals (Ravid 2006;Ravid & Cahana-Amitay 2005), often modified by derived adjectives in the attributive position (Ravid & Levie 2010), as well as longer and more complex noun phrases (Ravid & Berman 2010), often in the form of heavy compounds (Ravid & Zilberbuch 2003).…”
Section: 2 Speech and Writing In Hebrew Narrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with spoken texts, Hebrew written texts were found to be informationally denser, lexically richer and more diverse, as well as containing more high-register lexical items and morphological constructions (Berman & Nir 2011;, fewer repetitions, false starts, hedges, and other disfluencies (Ravid & Berman 2006). Written texts also contained more abstract and morphologically complex nominals (Ravid 2006;Ravid & Cahana-Amitay 2005), often modified by derived adjectives in the attributive position (Ravid & Levie 2010), as well as longer and more complex noun phrases (Ravid & Berman 2010), often in the form of heavy compounds (Ravid & Zilberbuch 2003).…”
Section: 2 Speech and Writing In Hebrew Narrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturalistic studies of spontaneous speech show that adjectives account for only about 5% of word tokens in child-directed speech [27,35]. Therefore, it is not surprising that adjective production was shown to be a good indicator of language proficiency [36] and language impairments [37][38][39].…”
Section: The Acquisition Of Adjectives By Hearing-impaired Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence points to skilled writers being able to construct coherent texts with longer and denser information packages in hierarchically complex syntactic constructions (Ravid in press; Ravid & Berman, 2010) which can be re-read, reviewed and revised by readers within their context without the pressures of on-line processing (Berman & Ravid, 2008;Ravid & Tolchinsky, 2002). This enables researchers to investigate the elusive concept of "syntactic complexity" in the context or writing.…”
Section: Written Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also find the production and comprehension of extended discourse challenging (Swisher et al, 1995). Once at school, they have difficulty in acquiring command of linguistic literacy, that is, written language skills related to thinking about language (Ravid & Tolchinsky 2002), of writing and reading, of written text comprehension and text production (Scott & Windsor 2000). Side by side as being a central, typical language disorders syndrome, language impairment has been at the center of a linguistic debate for several decades regarding language representation in the mind and in the brain (Leonard & Deevy 2006).…”
Section: Language Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%