2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedge fund vs. non-hedge fund institutional demand and the book-to-market effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dechow et al (2010) indicate that systematic inaccuracies in market expectations about long-term earnings growth can partially explain the success of contrarian investment techniques and the book-tomarket effect. Companies with high book-to-market ratios provide a unique opportunity to test the capacity of simple fundamental analysis heuristics to distinguish between them (Caglayan et al, 2018;Pätäri et al, 2022;Piotroski, 2000). Ball et al (2020), Papadamou et al (2017), and Piotroski (2000) argued that high BM value enterprises employ accounting indicators of financial soundness to distinguish really distressed firms from out-of-favor but financially strong firms.…”
Section: High Book-to-market and Growth Of Earnings Per Share Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dechow et al (2010) indicate that systematic inaccuracies in market expectations about long-term earnings growth can partially explain the success of contrarian investment techniques and the book-tomarket effect. Companies with high book-to-market ratios provide a unique opportunity to test the capacity of simple fundamental analysis heuristics to distinguish between them (Caglayan et al, 2018;Pätäri et al, 2022;Piotroski, 2000). Ball et al (2020), Papadamou et al (2017), and Piotroski (2000) argued that high BM value enterprises employ accounting indicators of financial soundness to distinguish really distressed firms from out-of-favor but financially strong firms.…”
Section: High Book-to-market and Growth Of Earnings Per Share Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is particularly evident for earnings announcements from small businesses, firms with high volatility, growth/value firms, and firms with low return on assets, implying that comparability is more informative for more speculative stocks. Caglayan et al (2018) compare the characteristics of growth stocks bought by hedge funds with those of growth stocks heavily bought by non-hedge funds and find some minor differences in characteristics such as book-to-market ratio, size, price, demand, idiosyncratic volatility, illiquidity, intangible returns, and standardized earnings surprises. Controlling for these stock features in Fama and MacBeth's (1973) multivariate regressions does not diminish the predictive power of hedge fund trading (demand) over the cross-sectional variance of future stock returns (Hanauer et al, 2022).…”
Section: Financial Performance Signals Used To Differentiate High Bm ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to decreasing yields on financial instruments, combined with persistently low yields of fixed income instruments, and the volatility of the property markets, investors continue to seek alternative sources of yield outside traditional strategies (Caglayan et al, 2018). Hedge funds have been an increasingly popular form of alternative investments since the turn of the millennium.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caglayan et al in (Caglayan, Celiker, & Sonaer, 2018) leveraged a study on comparing hedge fund and non-hedge fund and involved research on how these two kinds of funds affect the related stock price. Stock prices and returns data were obtained from the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) Monthly Stock File.…”
Section: Survey Of Existing Work In Financial Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%