Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In academic writing, hedging strategies help writers state uncertain scientific claims accurately, avoid personal responsibility and build better writer-reader relationships by addressing the need for deference and cooperation in gaining reader ratification. In Vietnam, little research investigates the hedging strategies employed by postgraduate students in academic writing. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate Vietnamese postgraduate students' use of hedging strategies in academic writing. The data were extracted from 30 written assignments in an academic writing course within a Master's program. The hedging strategies were analyzed and compared based on frequency, distribution, variety, and contextual use, employing Hyland's definition and taxonomy of hedging strategies. The findings revealed that postgraduate EFL students rely heavily on modal verbs, while nouns are the least favored. The findings suggest a need for further instructions and practice assignments on the use of hedging strategies in academic writing.
In academic writing, hedging strategies help writers state uncertain scientific claims accurately, avoid personal responsibility and build better writer-reader relationships by addressing the need for deference and cooperation in gaining reader ratification. In Vietnam, little research investigates the hedging strategies employed by postgraduate students in academic writing. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate Vietnamese postgraduate students' use of hedging strategies in academic writing. The data were extracted from 30 written assignments in an academic writing course within a Master's program. The hedging strategies were analyzed and compared based on frequency, distribution, variety, and contextual use, employing Hyland's definition and taxonomy of hedging strategies. The findings revealed that postgraduate EFL students rely heavily on modal verbs, while nouns are the least favored. The findings suggest a need for further instructions and practice assignments on the use of hedging strategies in academic writing.
Hedging devices abound in academic writing. Few studies, however, have examined how hedges have evolved in academic writing in an ESL context over time. Among the existing studies, contradictory findings exist. The present study was motivated by the contradictory findings and used a corpus of 28762 words culled from postgraduate theses written by L2 Civil Engineering students between 1980 and 2023 to examine the diachronic development of hedges.We used Hyland's (1998Hyland's ( , 2018 taxonomy of hedging devices to analyse the selected corpus. AntConc 4.2.4 Concordance software was used for the analysis of the data. To establish statistical significance, a log-likelihood test was also performed. The analysis revealed that over the past 43 years, the use of hedges has increased significantly (65.10%). Hedging modals were the most commonly used hedging type, whereas hedging nouns were the least frequently utilised. The study also discovered increases in the use of hedging verbs (63.10%), hedging adjectives (1.72%), hedging modals (66.67%), and hedging nouns (97.06%), but decreases in the use of hedging adverbs (-1.86%) and hedging quantifiers/determiners (21.89%). "See" and "show" were the most common lexical verbs, while "possible" and "potential" were the most common hedging adjectives. "Can" was the most often-used hedging modal, "probability" for hedging nouns and "usually" for hedging adverbs. The study concludes that theses in Civil Engineering are becoming more reader-oriented, and that writers' use of hedges contribute to an increase in persuasiveness in academic texts. The findings of this study have implications for teaching academic writing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.