Around the Book 2010
DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823232833.003.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hegel, Glas, and the Broader Modernity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Sussman, Glas sings this 'gl'; it 'pursues a meandering path, passing from one semantic field to another with unpredictability, impunity, speed, and seeming arbitrariness (that is, the arbitrariness is "always-already" installed in the language network itself)'. 38 Not mere word-play, this mark overturns traditional ideologies of sexuality and difference. Like the flower/glove knot, and swinging neither in the masculine nor the feminine, the 'gl' has, Derrida insists, 'no identity, sex, gender, makes no sense, is neither a definite whole nor a part detached from a whole': 'Gl remain(s) gl', he writes (119b-120b).…”
Section: * 21mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For Sussman, Glas sings this 'gl'; it 'pursues a meandering path, passing from one semantic field to another with unpredictability, impunity, speed, and seeming arbitrariness (that is, the arbitrariness is "always-already" installed in the language network itself)'. 38 Not mere word-play, this mark overturns traditional ideologies of sexuality and difference. Like the flower/glove knot, and swinging neither in the masculine nor the feminine, the 'gl' has, Derrida insists, 'no identity, sex, gender, makes no sense, is neither a definite whole nor a part detached from a whole': 'Gl remain(s) gl', he writes (119b-120b).…”
Section: * 21mentioning
confidence: 98%